A Chinese court has awarded New Balance $1.5 million in damages against local companies that infringed the sneaker giant's signature slanting “NB” logo, an unusually large award that experts say is positive sign for a jurisdiction that has often proved difficult for U.S. trademark owners.
A California federal judge said he wouldn’t dismiss Hulu LLC’s suit arguing it doesn't need to renew an expired licensing agreement for TiVo Corp.’s video searching technology, finding that a letter sent to Hulu about renewing its contract was enough to trigger subject-matter jurisdiction.
Showtime on Tuesday filed a lawsuit to stop more than 40 websites from pirating the much-hyped bout later this month pitting undefeated boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. against Ultimate Fighting Championship lightweight champion Conor McGregor.
Constantine Cannon LLP has nabbed a former Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Competition trial lawyer to join the firm's antitrust practice as a partner in its Washington, D.C., and San Francisco offices, where he will represent health care, pharmaceutical, retail and technology clients.
The Federal Trade Commission won a preliminary injunction Wednesday against the operators of an invention-promotion company that allegedly duped consumers out of about $26 million, as the judge found proof of material misrepresentations and a likelihood the government will prevail on the merits.
The Third Circuit on Thursday revealed the reasoning behind its decision earlier this month to affirm a win for GlaxoSmithKline PLC in litigation accusing it of stifling generic competition for Wellbutrin XL, saying the purchasers who brought the suit did not show they were injured by GSK.
Three months after it was shot down by the Ninth Circuit, a case that aims to prove that “google” has become a generic verb that cannot be protected by trademark law is headed for the U.S. Supreme Court.
America Invents Act reviews at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board can be a powerful tool for companies looking to take down a patent. But the board has shown little patience for missteps and blown deadlines. Here, experts share tips on how to manage cases and avoid blunders that can sink a case.
A Federal Circuit panel on Thursday affirmed a trial court’s ruling that Expedia Inc., Priceline.com Inc. and Travelocity.com LP did not infringe Cronos Technologies LLC’s patented online shopping cart system, saying the ruling correctly interpreted the meaning of certain key terms in the patent.
The Federal Circuit on Thursday affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's invalidation of a patent covering a method for making root canal instruments, agreeing that the patented method was obvious in view of prior art.
An Eastern District of Texas judge said two Bunch-O-Balloons patents should not be found unenforceable for inequitable conduct, deciding that failure to provide a patent examiner with a copy of a relevant Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision was not a basis for punishment.
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Wednesday denied Comcast Cable Communications’ request for a new trial to increase the $1.5 million jury award it received in its patent suit accusing Sprint Communications Company of stealing text message technology, saying there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s decision.
The Federal Circuit on Thursday refused Prism Technologies LLC’s request to revisit a decision that upheld the nixing of the company’s $100 million infringement lawsuit against T-Mobile and invalidated its network authentication patents.
Elon Musk's solar power company SolarCity Corp. can't escape a competitor’s unfair and unlawful competition suit alleging it stole trade secrets after breaking a promise to partner because it’s plausible Cogenra Solar Inc. relied on that promise when it turned down offers from other interested parties, a California federal judge said on Wednesday.
The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday provided a California federal judge with a privilege log in support of the agency’s argument that it shouldn’t have to reveal its informants in its antitrust suit accusing Qualcomm Inc. of unfair patent licensing practices, as well as a supplemental letter from the European Commission director-general for competition.
Vice President Mike Pence offered mostly kind words for the U.S. free trade agreement with Chile on Wednesday but also said that Santiago could improve its compliance with the pact’s intellectual property provisions.
As the Trump administration forges ahead with the first round of negotiations to revamp the North American Free Trade Agreement this week, a leading tech industry organization has called on officials to make sure they tackle modern trade challenges in areas such as intellectual property and digital trade flows.
Soul singer Syl Johnson asked the Seventh Circuit on Wednesday to rehear en banc a ruling dismissing his suit claiming that music's biggest recording labels sampled his song "Different Strokes" without getting his permission or paying him royalties.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup said Wednesday he might allow Waymo to tell a California federal jury that Uber was evasive about providing evidence the head of its self-driving car division stole trade secrets from Waymo before quitting his job there, saying the panel should know “how they hide the ball.”
The Federal Circuit affirmed a Delaware district court ruling that two video-streaming patents that VideoShare LLC accused YouTube LLC and its parent company Google Inc. of infringing are invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice decision because they only cover the abstract idea of sharing streaming video online.
A California high court decision that an earlier ruling in favor of a Latham & Watkins LLP client protects the firm from malicious prosecution claims, despite a later bad-faith finding against the client, reinforces that such suits can only be brought over the most meritless of allegations and buttresses a key defense for firms, experts say.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday put tighter restrictions on where patent owners can file infringement lawsuits, a decision that upends nearly 30 years of established practice and will likely force many lawsuits out of the patent litigation hotbed of the Eastern District of Texas. Here, check out all of our best coverage of the case.
A case in the Southern District of New York centers on a play that presents a wicked spin on Dr. Seuss’ “How the Grinch Stole Christmas!,” and may test the boundaries of what is parody, what is transformative, and how much taking is “fair,” says Jim Burger of Thompson Coburn LLP.
As of last month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's reluctance to engage in drug price-control efforts may be changing. There are several controversial Hatch-Waxman issues that the FDA may set its sights on in the near future, say Sapna Palla and Kristyn Hansen of Wiggin and Dana LLP
Software innovations are being made by companies in the entertainment, financial services, health care and media industries, among others. At the same time, it has become more complicated for counsel to advise on the best strategy for protecting those inventions, says Joshua Simmons of Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
Following Brexit, if the EU regulations directly applicable to intellectual property law are not transposed into English or Scottish law, a regulatory vacuum could be created. For patents, this could mean the first lack of substantive legal protection in over 700 years, says Roberta Young of Loza & Loza LLP.
If the media is going to cover your law firm’s crisis, they are going to cover it with or without your firm’s input. But your involvement can help shape the story and improve your firm’s image in the public eye, says Michelle Samuels, vice president of public relations at Jaffe.
In the final part of their article, Brian Kwok and Nicholas Lo of Haynes and Boone LLP discuss other factors courts consider in the “regular and established place of business” analysis, the Eastern District of Texas’ new framework set forth in Raytheon, and how the historical case law fits into the Raytheon approach.
The U.S. Supreme Court determined that Sandoz “violated” the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act by failing to disclose its confidential information to Amgen. On remand, it would appear that the Federal Circuit may well rule that Amgen’s claim of unfair competition will succeed because a federal law was “violated," say Brian Coggio and Ron Vogel of Fish & Richardson PC.
In the final article in this series on proposed innovations to the American jury trial, Stephen Susman, Richard Lorren Jolly and Dr. Roy Futterman of the NYU School of Law Civil Jury Project sum up the improvements they believe the U.S. jury system desperately needs.
The precise meaning of the phrase “a regular and established place of business” is receiving renewed attention following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in TC Heartland. The two most prominent factors courts have commonly considered in the “regular and established” analysis are physical location and employee authority, say Brian Kwok and Nicholas Lo of Haynes and Boone LLP.
Ask your colleagues in patent prosecution how they select material for dependent claims; you might be surprised how few carefully refined strategies you hear. So then, how do you optimize claim sets, to ensure your clients receive high-quality, cost-effective patents? I have some recommendations, says Kelce Wilson of Grable Martin Fulton PLLC.