Bud Light used an actor dressed as a medieval town crier last week to ask a Minnesota brewery to stop using the company’s trademarks, becoming the latest brand to transform a cease-and-desist into a marketing stunt.
The wife of a former Statoil unit chief argued Friday that the court should dismiss the company’s claims against her because it had failed to prove she knew about her husband’s alleged scheme to steal information and technology to benefit a business he set up after leaving the company.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to take up a copyright case filed by adult website operator Perfect 10 Inc. against Giganews Inc., leaving in place a Ninth Circuit ruling that the service couldn’t be held liable for infringing images shared by its users.
The former director of Medix Staffing Solutions Inc.’s pharmaceutical and biotechnology staffing division asked a Illinois federal judge on Friday to dismiss the staffing agency’s suit alleging he breached his employment contract by joining rival ProLink Staffing.
The accelerated course of the Republicans’ $1.4 trillion tax cut bill, heralding some of the most sweeping changes for corporations in decades, has created ambiguities that could take years to iron out while the process to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill will leave nothing sacrosanct, including the cardinal 20 percent corporate tax rate.
Sprint sued Charter in Delaware federal court Friday for allegedly infringing patents on technology that lets users make phone calls over the internet, the latest in a series of suits that have produced a verdict and settlements worth hundreds of millions of dollars for Sprint.
The Federal Circuit on Friday gave Microsoft and IBM a renewed opportunity to seek to invalidate two Parallel Networks webpage-management patents, finding that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board wrongly concluded the tech giants failed to show the patents are invalid.
Latham & Watkins LLP on Thursday filed suit in Virginia federal court against a website it said purports to hire people to work at Latham from home, tricking them into fronting the money to buy office equipment or pay for training materials, then reimbursing them with fraudulent checks.
Pfizer Inc. and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were allowed access on Friday to what a Boston federal judge described as critical information guarded by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and development partner Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. in a claim seeking to add two American researchers to six cancer immunotherapy patents.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board said Friday it would not review a patent that Blackbird Technologies has accused Netflix Inc. and Starz Entertainment LLC of infringing, finding a defensive patent group hadn’t shown various claims were likely invalid.
Attorneys looking to stay abreast of the legal landscape surrounding noncompete agreements had their hands full over the last six months, with new legislation popping up in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, court rulings coming down on LinkedIn solicitations and injunctions, and Illinois' attorney general setting her sights on noncompete pacts for low-wage workers. Here, experts identify developments from the second half of 2017 that lawyers who deal with restrictive covenants ought to have on their radar.
In Law360’s latest roundup of new actions at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, "Call of Duty" owner Activision takes aim at a "Call of Booty" name, Facebook continues to target "-book" marks, and New York City's Bryant Park becomes the center of a trademark dispute.
A record label sharing a name with the hit TV show “Empire” urged the Ninth Circuit on Thursday to reconsider en banc its November ruling in the label’s trademark suit against Fox, saying that the decision gave the broadcaster “free rein” to pit the fictional label against the real record label’s mark.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Thursday invalidated numerous claims in a patent related to LTE wireless technology that the owner, Evolved Wireless LLC, has accused Apple, Samsung and other smartphone makers of infringing.
Vitamin companies accused of patent infringement urged a California federal judge Thursday to grant them a new trial after losing a $6.8 million jury verdict in September, saying the evidence doesn’t support the jury’s finding.
A panel of U.S. practitioners with decades of experience in transfer pricing suggested the level of detail in current rules has gone too far and advocated a return to more fundamental principles during a panel discussion Friday.
The Federal Circuit on Thursday rejected a German technology company’s request for a full panel to rehear its appeal of a jury’s finding that the mapping patent the company had accused Google Earth of infringing in a $106 million case was invalid as both anticipated and obvious.
New guidelines from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board about how it will handle remands from the Federal Circuit, which include the involvement of top board judges in each case, will help streamline the remand process and make it more predictable, attorneys say.
In this week’s intellectual property partners on the move, Leason Ellis snags a trio of IP attorneys, Cozen O'Connor welcomes a litigator who is the grandson of a DLA Piper founder, and Fox Rothschild adds an international trade duo. Here are details on these and other IP attorneys who have landed new jobs.
Disney Enterprises Inc. filed a complaint in California federal court against Redbox Automated Retail LLC Thursday, alleging the rental kiosk illegally sells Disney’s digital movie codes to its customers in “blatant disregard” of clear prohibitions against doing so and in violation of copyrights.
A California federal judge told Google on Thursday she’s not inclined to trim trade secret misappropriation claims from an Arizona company’s suit claiming the tech giant stole its ideas for large floating balloon-based internet platforms, rejecting Google’s assertion the allegations aren't backed by facts.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday put tighter restrictions on where patent owners can file infringement lawsuits, a decision that upends nearly 30 years of established practice and will likely force many lawsuits out of the patent litigation hotbed of the Eastern District of Texas. Here, check out all of our best coverage of the case.
The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Owens Corning v. Fast Felt — reversing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s final written decision — should serve as a reminder to practitioners that claim construction is reviewed de novo at the Federal Circuit, says Raghav Bajaj of Haynes and Boone LLP.
A few jurists and commentators have recently caused a stir in the e-discovery community by arguing that litigants should avoid using keyword searches to filter or cull a document population before using predictive coding. This “no-cull” rationale undermines the principle of proportionality at the heart of the recent changes to Federal Rule 26, say John Rosenthal and Jason Moore of Winston & Strawn LLP.
Should the U.S. Supreme Court reverse in SAS Institute and eliminate the practice of partial institution for inter partes review, patent owners and challengers alike must be prepared to address the significant ramifications, say Danielle Phillip and Allyn Elliott of Brinks Gilson & Lione.
The Federal Circuit's decision last month in Amgen v. Sanofi undoubtedly will have a major impact on how written description and enablement are litigated for genus claims in general and for functional antibody claims in particular, say Irena Royzman and Andrew Cohen of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP.
By "unicorn" I don’t mean the next great tech startup with a valuation of $1 billion. I mean the new breed of lawyers realizing that there are better ways to get their day jobs done, says Lucy Endel Bassli, assistant general counsel leading the legal operations and contracting functions at Microsoft Corp.
As widespread claims of sexual misconduct continue to surface in the entertainment industry and beyond, a discussion of how judges treat workplace discrimination cases may be particularly timely. Here, U.S. District Judge John McConnell reviews the book "Unequal: How America’s Courts Undermine Discrimination Law," by professors Sandra Sperino and Suja Thomas.
When preparing an inter partes review petition, petitioners often feel pressure to include every conceivable ground of unpatentability. But if a large number of very similar grounds are brought, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may not consider all of them, says Thomas Negley of Sughrue Mion PLLC.
In this series, attorneys explore the challenges and rewards of pro bono volunteering in the legal profession.
Halloween is tough if you are an intellectual property lawyer who likes to dress up. Anyone who knows about your job will be unable to resist lame and legally incorrect jokes about your Halloween costume. But sharing some real facts about Halloween costume copyrights might be the best response, says David Kluft of Foley Hoag LLP.
Preparing witnesses to be deposed is a critical element of discovery. It is important to remember that each witness is an individual with unique personal qualities, strengths and weaknesses. Getting to know the witness helps establish rapport and trust, says Alan Hoffman of Husch Blackwell LLP.