Patent owners from the U.S. and other Western countries are increasingly looking to China as they consider places to file patent infringement lawsuits, drawn by the allure of a system that is faster, less expensive and offers powerful injunctions that can provide valuable leverage in a dispute.
Three former BigLaw partners have started a boutique Bay Area firm specializing in tax, intellectual property, white collar and consumer protection law.
A former Patton Boggs intellectual property partner cannot sue his bankruptcy attorney for malpractice over her handling of his personal Chapter 7 bankruptcy case since that claim is property of his bankruptcy estate and can only be brought by the trustee, a Virginia federal judge held Friday.
The Federal Circuit on Friday let stand an Eastern District of Texas jury verdict that cleared Apple of infringing a cellular communications patent originally issued to Nokia and now owned by a patent licensing company led by an ex-Apple executive.
In Law360’s latest roundup of new actions at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Dr. Pepper is stymied in its efforts to register a hard root beer brand, Major League Baseball takes on a bong maker over "Major League Dabbing," and Dom Perignon is nonplussed about a dog pun.
The Third Circuit on Friday backed Rohm & Haas Co.’s victory over a former employee’s allegations that the Dow Chemical Co. unit retaliated against her for filing bias complaints, ruling that flaws in the company lawyer’s testimony were understandable given the time span of the litigation.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has held that four patents covering media file playback are not eligible for review under the America Invents Act's covered business method program, saying the owner was not wrong to strike finance-related elements from the patents once Facebook Inc. and Instagram LLC challenged them.
An Oregon company locked in a dispute over patents on a system for detecting gas leaks defended the Federal Circuit’s use of summary orders Thursday, saying the court is not legally required to write an opinion in all appeals arising from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry has bolstered its intellectual property practice with the addition of a former Osha Liang LLP attorney who brings more than 15 years of experience in a broad range of technologies, including medical devices and information security, the firm has announced.
A California judge refused Friday to toss a $100 million suit accusing the maker of hit mobile phone game "Game of War" of driving a data storage center to bankruptcy, ruling that Peak Web LLC has adequately alleged that Machine Zone Inc. breached their contract and stole trade secrets to build its own data center.
Three Allcare Health Management Systems shareholders on Thursday urged a Texas federal judge to shut down Highmark Inc.’s attempt to hold them individually responsible for $5.2 million in attorneys’ fees from a lost patent infringement suit, arguing the insurer failed to outline what role they had in the company’s wrongdoing.
The Federal Circuit on Friday revived part of an Apple touch-screen patent that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidated after Samsung was ordered to pay $113 million for infringing it, though the court found the claim at issue in the Samsung case invalid.
Prominent patent-licensing firm Intellectual Ventures has urged the Federal Circuit to revive its claims against J. Crew and a fresh-flower delivery company over two patents that U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap invalidated in Texas last year.
A George Mason University law school unit has urged the Chinese government to recalibrate long-gestating guidelines applying China's antitrust law to intellectual property to better recognize the rights of patent holders.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board decided Thursday not to review a T-Rex Property AB patent related to digital signage, ending a challenge to a patent that dozens of companies, including Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group, have been accused of infringing.
An American International Group insurer doesn't have to defend or indemnify Zillow Inc. in a lawsuit alleging that it misused digital images on its online real estate database, a Washington federal judge ruled Thursday, holding that the underlying claim was first made prior to the policy period.
An activist group opposing the use of Native American mascots praised Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred on Thursday for talking with the Cleveland Indians about moving away from their controversial “Chief Wahoo” logo, and called on NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to take on the “Redskins” moniker next.
Juniper Networks Inc. asked a judge in the Eastern District of Texas for more time to respond to an infringement lawsuit brought by Blue Spike LLC, saying on Thursday that it was a “Herculean” task to come up with an appropriate answer to the largest patent case currently in the country.
The estate of Michael Jackson has accused the IRS's intellectual property expert of lying under oath during a high-profile tax trial in Los Angeles with hundreds of millions of dollars at stake, urging the U.S. Tax Court to turn down the agency’s bid to scrub parts of his testimony from the public record.
A North Carolina federal judge has granted pesticide maker Willowood a quick escape from rival Syngenta Crop Protection LLC's copyright infringement claims in a suit over pesticide labels, finding that the parts of pesticide labels that are required under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act are exempt from copyright protection.
A sports memorabilia dealer has told a New Jersey state court that a 2010 email exchange between New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning and the team's equipment director proves that Manning knowingly provided fake game-used helmets for a memorabilia retailer to sell to fans.
Like everything else, the art of negotiation starts by having a conversation. It’s about being respectful, finding common ground, knowing what you want and, most importantly, listening. A conversation between two lawyers can be complicated at best, but by employing a few techniques and tactics, it doesn’t have to be that way, says Marc Siegel of Siegel & Dolan Ltd.
Petitioners are struggling to challenge design patents at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, particularly at the institution stage. Overall, if noninstitution is taken into account, only 22 percent of design patent challenges have proven successful. The statistics reflect positively on the quality of original examination, say Tracy-Gene Durkin and Pauline Pelletier of Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox PLLC.
Lawyers make hundreds of decisions during the course of advising a client, consummating a transaction or litigating a case. In this new column, dispute resolution experts Bob Creo and Selina Shultz explore the theory, science and practical aspects of how decisions are made in the legal community.
The Federal Circuit's decision in Prism v. Sprint this month illustrates an example of the "footprint" approach to patent damages, interesting because of its focus on costs — and not revenues — as a reasonable royalty measure, say attorneys with Robins Kaplan LLP.
What we don’t know is whether the teaching and practice of law are undergoing massive structural changes or we’re still digging out from the worst economic collapse since the Depression. But what we do know is that the missions of the most forward-looking law schools and law firms are converging in ways that were unimaginable 10 years ago, says Randy Gordon, a partner at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP and executive professor of law at Te... (continued)
There appears to be a greater willingness among pharmaceutical companies to wade through the still relatively untested post-grant review process when compared with their initial hesitation regarding the initiation of inter partes review proceedings, say Kevin Chrustowski of TK Holdings Inc. and Donald Prather of Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC.
A number of Federal Circuit decisions have focused on some of the disputed issues highlighted in Apple v. Samsung. The court seems to be grappling with five questions, the resolutions of which have the potential to significantly impact the application of the nonobviousness principle in patent law, say Thomas King and Pranay Pattani of Haynes and Boone LLP.
The importance of authenticity is magnified when trying a case outside your home jurisdiction. While using references to local landmarks or history can help make arguments relatable, adopting local expressions or style in an attempt to ingratiate oneself with the judge and jury almost always backfires, say William Oxley and Meghan Rohling Kelly of Dechert LLP.
A U.S. trademark application to register the term "Triggerpoint" has piqued the interest of many in the fitness and massage industries. By the time the opposition window closed on March 2, there were 45 entities and individuals requesting extensions to oppose Implus Footcare’s filing. Why all the fuss? The term may be merely descriptive, say Russell Tarleton and Jennifer Ashton of Seed IP Law Group LLP.
The America Invents Act is carrying out its intended effect to prevent abuse of the patent system. Although issues remain, the data show that the patent system is finding increased stability over time and that further adjustments aimed at curbing perceived abuse by patentees are not needed, says David Kappos, a partner with Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP and former director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.