Almost two-thirds of Europe's patent infringement cases are lodged in Germany, where the losing side has to pay and injunctions are granted as of right, the first stop on Law360's look at prominent patent jurisdictions around the globe.
A Texas federal judge has issued an order barring a convenience store from using its cartoon alligator logo, after a jury in May sided with popular convenience store chain Buc-ee's Ltd. in a trademark infringement row, finding the convenience store's logo infringed Buc-ee's cartoon beaver logo.
The owner of several telecommunications patents urged the Federal Circuit on Friday to leave in place its recent finding that foreign companies can be sued for patent infringement anywhere in the U.S., saying its lawsuit against Taiwan-based HTC Corp. should be allowed to proceed in Delaware.
On the eve of trial in Arista Networks Inc.'s antitrust suit against Cisco Systems Inc. in California federal court on Monday, the parties settled multiple disputes in a deal that sees Arista paying $400 million and Cisco dropping patent infringement allegations.
CVS Pharmacy Inc. launched an antitrust suit in New Jersey federal court Friday accusing Pfizer Inc. of fraudulently obtaining a patent and conspiring with Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. to delay generic competition to the cholesterol drug Lipitor, saying the alleged scheme cost the pharmacy giant hundreds of millions of dollars.
The Federal Trade Commission is exceeding its authority by trying to preemptively block Shire ViroPharma Inc. from petitioning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to delay generic competition based on theoretical concerns it may do so, the drugmaker told the Third Circuit in a newly filed brief.
The Federal Circuit on Friday ruled JTEKT Corp. doesn't have standing to appeal a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision upholding part of a patent that the auto parts maker has said poses a risk to its development of a drivetrain product.
Fiat Chrysler has slapped an Indian competitor with a complaint claiming it ripped off the classic design of the Jeep, manufactured the automobile overseas and then sold it to consumers in the United States, telling the U.S. International Trade Commission that the trademark violation has undercut sales.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has turned down Pfizer Inc.'s challenge to a patent covering Genentech Inc.'s blockbuster cancer treatment Avastin, finding the challenger couldn't prove the patent shouldn't have been issued.
The Second Circuit has revived a nearly two-decade-old trademark fight between jean maker Lucky Brand and a smaller rival, a ruling that included a first-of-its-kind application of the doctrine of res judicata.
In Law360's latest roundup of new actions at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Honda takes exception to a new Ford "Pilot" brand, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia goes after a rival logo, and a battle six decades in the making erupts between Jiffy Pop and Jif.
The California Institute of Technology on Thursday notched a couple of wins in its patent fight with Apple Inc. over Wi-Fi technology when the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruled that the iPhone maker failed to show that numerous claims in one of CalTech's patents were invalid.
In this week’s round of intellectual property moves, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP landed a seven-member team of IP partners, while Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP brought on board a leading cross-border transaction specialist in San Francisco, and Cozen O'Connor snagged a trial lawyer seasoned with brand protection and trademark enforcement dispute experience. Here are the details on these and other notable hires.
The Chinese government teed up a new round of tariffs targeting $60 billion worth of U.S. goods Friday, ramping up its retaliation against President Donald Trump’s own sweeping tariff regime aimed at countering Beijing’s intellectual property and technology acquisition rules.
A General Electric Co. engineer involved in multiple Chinese companies has been arrested after the FBI filed a criminal complaint in New York federal court Wednesday, claiming he stole trade secrets related to turbine technology and tried to conceal them in the code of a digital photo.
CNBC LLC, NBCUniversal Media LLC and the production company behind CNBC’s show “American Greed” had false advertising claims trimmed Thursday from a Delaware federal court suit brought by a company affiliated with a former defense contractor whose life story became the film “War Dogs.”
A California federal judge on Thursday tentatively denied most of Facebook Inc. and Snap Inc.’s bids to invalidate seven mobile messaging patents at the heart of BlackBerry’s infringement suits against the social media giants, writing that it appears only one of the patents is invalid under Alice.
A California federal judge denied H&M's bid for judgment as a matter of law following an $845,000 jury win for Unicolors, which claimed the Swedish clothing giant ripped off a jacket and shirt pattern, but ruled that H&M can pursue a new trial on damages unless Unicolors agrees to lowered damages of $266,000.
A New York federal judge remained unswayed by a frozen smoothies startup's assertion that a former partner should be stopped from launching its own brand this month, finding its trade dress is not distinctive and consumers ultimately wouldn't be confused.
An artist who’s suing an adult entertainment company for allegedly violating her copyrights by filming porn with her artwork in the background can’t have full exposure to the names of everyone involved in the shoots yet, a Massachusetts federal judge ruled Thursday.
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Wednesday declined to centralize in Colorado or Texas federal court nine infringement suits involving digital data compression patents filed against Hulu, Netflix and others, determining that the allegations against the companies are too disparate.
One year ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling on where patent lawsuits can be filed. It was expected to shake up patent litigation in a big way. But did that happen? Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact the case had on the patent landscape.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued two big patent rulings — upholding a system for challenging patents as constitutional, but finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must decide the validity of every challenged claim when it agrees to institute those American Invents Act reviews. Here, Law360 looks at how we got here, what the court ruled, and how these decisions will impact practicing before the PTAB.
After a three-year surge, patent suits at the Federal Circuit leveled off last year as the court showed signs of adjusting to its bustling workload. The judges found time to write more opinions, and they reached greater consensus, penning fewer separate concurrences and dissents than in 2016.
The very first America Invents Act derivation proceeding was instituted on March 21, 2018 — more than five years after the AIA was enacted. In these proceedings, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has the ability to fashion remedies. But it does not appear to be a proceeding many are pursuing, say attorneys with Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP.
The “commercial scale” threshold for intellectual property-related criminal offenses appears in important international agreements. However, there has not been a consensus on the understanding of the term, which leaves a wide and opaque margin for interpretation by countries, judges and lawyers, say Tran Manh Hung and Hoang Ngoc Quan of Baker McKenzie.
The recent Pennsylvania federal court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie is likely to have significant effects on antitrust cases challenging patent litigations as shams, say Leslie John and Stephen Kastenberg of Ballard Spahr LLP.
Techniques used to address questions of obviousness in the U.K. may prove useful to practitioners addressing questions of patent eligibility in the U.S., say Christopher Carroll and Charles Larsen of White & Case LLP.
Earlier this year, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., made headlines with his decision to leave Congress and return to law. In this series, former members of Congress who made that move discuss how their experience on the Hill influenced their law practice.
The District of Massachusetts recently issued an updated rule for scheduling and procedures in patent infringement cases, to make the district a more convenient venue. Perhaps the most important change is the newly accelerated litigation timeline, says Aaron Jacobs of Prince Lobel Tye LLP.
While resolving the issue of the availability of foreign lost profits in the context of Section 271(f)(2), the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in WesternGeco v. Ion leaves many issues unresolved, say Mark Kachner and Karen Vogel Weil of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.
The Senate Republican leadership and the Trump administration are racing to fill Justice Anthony Kennedy’s spot on the U.S. Supreme Court. Does opposition to their plans have any chance of success? My answer is yes, because the stakes are so high, people are so engaged, and the records of those short-listed are so deeply troubling, says Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice.
As clients increasingly look to limit their own liability exposure, they can reasonably expect that their retained counsel should do the same. In this context, a carefully crafted, thoughtfully presented engagement letter can help a law firm strike a successful balance between protecting itself and preserving a client relationship, say Stuart Pattison and John Muller of Sompo International Holdings Ltd.
In this analysis of disciplinary action trends in the legal industry, Edwards Neils LLC managing member Jean Edwards examines data provided by bar organizations for 17 states and the District of Columbia.