Feature

Simpson Suit Spotlights In-House Counsel's Clashing Roles

By Sam Reisman (October 4, 2018, 7:18 PM EDT) -- A recently settled nonpayment suit between a legal recruiter and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP shined a light on the importance for in-house law firm counsel of delineating between administrative and legal functions, in order to avert a potentially thorny discovery dispute in litigation.

At issue in the Simpson Thacher case were 28 emails between firm partners, including two "co-administrative partners" who doubled as "firm counsel," that the firm withheld from production on the basis of attorney-client privilege. According to multiple legal ethics experts, the case demonstrates potential pitfalls of not having a concretely established firm general counsel office that is...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Related Sections

Law Firms

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!