A Possible Limit On High Court 2005 Agency Deference Ruling

Law360 (March 6, 2020, 4:22 PM EST) -- Recently, Justice Clarence Thomas, the author of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services,[1] argued that the decision should be overruled or at least reconsidered.[2]

The Brand X decision held that an agency interpretation of a statute can be eligible for Chevron[3] deference despite a prior conflicting federal appellate court precedent, so long as the prior decision did not hold that the statute clearly or unambiguously precluded the agency interpretation.[4]

This situation is reminiscent of that which occurred regarding another Supreme Court decision on deference to administrative agencies, Auer v. Robbins,[5]...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!