Salini Impregilo SpA is eyeing a possible deal to buy some or all of Italian construction company Astaldi; CannTrust is discussing a partnership deal in the food, beverage and cosmetics industries; and Civitas Solutions Inc. is exploring a possible sale.
A Massachusetts federal court approved a settlement sought by Verizon when it overturned a Massachusetts town’s zoning board’s decision to deny the company an application to build a cell tower and gave it a special permit to construct the tower.
Holland & Knight LLP has added two former Seyfarth Shaw LLP real estate finance attorneys to the firm's Boston office, picking up negotiators specializing in loans and other financing transactions with experience on major projects across the country.
Federal prosecutors pressed Friday for a disbarred New York attorney, who had been a fugitive for 20 years, to forfeit the nearly $1.8 million he admitted to stealing through two bayfront-development scams in Massachusetts, requesting to draw down his retirement account from Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP decades after the firm fired him.
A D.C. federal judge on Friday affirmed that U.S. presidents have authority under the Antiquities Act to designate offshore areas as national monuments where commercial fishing operations could be barred.
In this week’s Taxation With Representation, Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. snaps up Core Nutrition LLC for $435 million, Stryker inks a $220M deal for HyperBranch Medical Technology Inc., and Honeywell International Inc. snags German warehouse automation business Transnorm for €425 million ($492 million).
One of the world's largest gambling practices has expanded into Boston with Greenberg Traurig LLP's hire of a leading expert in the industry at a moment of massive growth.
A pair of Democratic senators and several consumer organizations are urging the Federal Trade Commission to take a closer look at the data collection and tracking practices of child-directed apps, with the advocacy groups specifically targeting Facebook's kid-centric messaging service for allegedly violating federal children's privacy rules.
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. asked the First Circuit on Thursday to overturn $280,000 in attorneys' fees that a Massachusetts federal judge handed a former employee, adding to the real estate company's appeal of a jury verdict finding the company fired the longtime computer engineer because he was aging and awarding him $1.28 million.
A small, diverse group of Harvard College students and alumni can testify against claims that the prestigious school discriminates against Asian-American undergraduate applicants, receiving the blessing of a Massachusetts federal judge who will preside over the imminent bench trial.
A First Circuit panel on Thursday said it wouldn’t reconsider its decision to uphold the dismissal of an antitrust suit accusing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. of delaying a generic version of its leukemia drug Gleevec.
The federal government asked the U.S. Supreme Court to shield several high-ranking government officials from court orders forcing them to answer questions about the decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, telling the justices that the expanded discovery is unconstitutional as well as arbitrary and capricious.
Athena Diagnostics and Oxford University Innovation Ltd. on Thursday asked a Federal Circuit panel to revive their patent for a test that diagnoses an autoimmune disease based on the presence of certain antibodies, saying a lower court erred in finding the patent covered an ineligible law of nature.
Bread-maker Gold Medal Bakery argued in Massachusetts federal court Thursday that it had the right to fire a supervisor, now suing the company for $2 million, who did not return to work after a 12-week leave for knee surgery.
A bill introduced by Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., the vice chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, and several of his Democratic colleagues aims to remove potential barriers to election participation for Native Americans they argue have been exacerbated by the Supreme Court's overturning of a section of the Voting Rights Act.
The head of what federal authorities say was a sham Swiss asset management firm whose many international market manipulation schemes netted nearly $165 million was arrested in Boston Wednesday on securities fraud charges, officials announced.
An official at the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission on Wednesday praised a Massachusetts federal court decision in a fraud case that bolsters the agency’s ability to prosecute cryptocurrency fraud.
An insurance dispute over losses suffered by Merrimack College from an employee’s $6 million fraudulent student loan scheme is headed to arbitration, a Massachusetts federal judge ruled Tuesday after the college disputed a forensic accountant’s assessment of the coverage.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard a truck driver's arguments Wednesday that Congress had the foresight in the 1920s to prohibit commerce employers such as New Prime Inc. from forcing independent contractors, like all other cross-border workers, into arbitration.
The estate of a woman who died in a nursing home has urged the First Circuit to reinstate a Massachusetts federal court's initial finding that an insurance claims administrator’s $2 million settlement offer wasn’t reasonable or timely, arguing that it was too small and too late to satisfy consumer protection laws.
The Massachusetts high court recently found that a shoe manufacturer’s use of a runner’s name potentially triggered advertising injury insurance coverage, even though the name had not acquired secondary meaning or trademark status. The Holyoke v. Vibram decision is notable because of the court's focus on the intent of the athlete's family business, says Gregory May of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP.
In this series featuring law school luminaries, Stanford Law School professor Jeffrey Fisher discusses his motivation for teaching, arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court and what the court might look like if Judge Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed.
The first comprehensive overhaul of California's Rules of Professional Conduct in nearly 30 years becomes operational on Nov. 1. Some of the new rules mirror the model language used by the American Bar Association, but many continue to reflect California’s unique approach to certain ethical questions, says Mark Loeterman of Signature Resolution LLC.
The balancing act between protecting attorneys’ speech rights and ensuring unbiased adjudications was highlighted recently in two cases — when Michael Cohen applied for a restraining order against Stephanie Clifford's attorney, and when Johnson & Johnson questioned whether a Missouri talc verdict was tainted by public statements from the plaintiffs' counsel, says Matthew Giardina of Manning Gross & Massenburg LLP.
In this monthly series, Amanda Brady of Major Lindsey & Africa interviews management from top law firms about the increasingly competitive business environment. Here we feature Melanie Green, chief client development officer at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
Because current state laws relating to marijuana-impaired driving lack an objective impairment standard, only those who clearly demonstrate impaired driving are likely to be prosecuted and convicted, says Ian Stewart of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP.
In this new series featuring law school luminaries, Widener University Delaware Law School dean Rodney Smolla discusses teaching philosophies, his interest in First Amendment law, and arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court in Virginia v. Black.
A Massachusetts federal court ruled last year in Gustavsen v. Alcon Laboratories that the plaintiffs’ attacks on the size of eye drops were a challenge to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approved dose of that product. Last week, the First Circuit affirmed — proving that weak, lawyer-driven litigation can still produce good decisions on preemption, says James Beck of Reed Smith LLP.
This fall, in New Prime v. Dominic Oliveira, the U.S. Supreme Court will be presented with two important questions related to the Federal Arbitration Act’s Section 1 exemption. The ruling could have major ramifications for the transportation industry, where arbitration provisions are often included in employment or independent contractor agreements, says Cary Sullivan of Jones Day.
A few weeks ago, the IRS proposed regulations related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's 20 percent deduction on qualified business income for pass-through entities. The guidance offers long-awaited clarity, but is mostly bad news for many law firms, says Evan Morgan of Kaufman Rossin PA.