Expert Analysis

• Whole Foods Win Shows Workplace Rules Can Shield Cos.

  

  In Kinzer v. Whole Foods Market, a Massachusetts federal judge recently ruled against employees alleging they faced retaliation for wearing Black Lives Matter masks to work, demonstrating that carefully written and universally applied workplace policies can protect employers from Title VII discrimination claims, says Elizabeth Johnston at Verrill Dana.

• 8 Steps To Improve The Perception Of In-House Legal Counsel

  

  With the pandemic paving the way for a reputational shift in favor of in-house corporate legal teams, there are proactive steps that legal departments can take to fully rebrand themselves as strong allies and generators of value, says Allison Rosner at Major Lindsey.

• Ruling Casts Shadow On Cannabis Employees' Ch. 13 Relief

  

  The far-reaching dicta in a Massachusetts bankruptcy court's recent denial of a Chapter 13 petition cast uncertainty on the viability of bankruptcy relief for prospective debtors working in the cannabis industry — despite the ruling's narrow holding, say attorneys at Mintz.

• Probe Shows OSHA Regulating Cannabis Cos. Like All Others

  

  Cannabis companies should consider the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's recent investigation into Trulieve following the death of an employee a harbinger of major compliance issues to come, as well as a call to recognize and respond to the hazards that their employees may be exposed to at work, say Kathryn Brown and Elisabeth Bassani at Duane Morris.

• Procedure Rule 7.1 Can Simplify Litigators' Diversity Analysis

  

  A recent amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 will help trial courts determine whether the parties to a case are diverse, and may also allow litigators to more quickly determine whether they can remove certain cases to federal court, says Steve Shapiro at Schnader Harrison.

• 5 Steps Cos. Can Take Amid Surge In 'Right To Repair' Actions

  

  The recent reemergence of Federal Trade Commission, class action and legislative scrutiny regarding product warranties and product design features that restrict how consumers repair and service products should send a clear warning to companies, say attorneys at White & Case.

• What High Court Case Could Mean For Gene Therapy Patents

  

  The U.S. Supreme Court's upcoming decision in Amgen v. Sanofi, and other recent antibody patent litigation, may provide guidance to gene-therapy patent challengers seeking to narrow genus claims, say Daniel Margolis, Mena Gaballah and Jane Cullis at Allen & Overy.

• Atty Conflict Discussions In Idaho Murder Case And Beyond

  

  A public defender's representation of the accused University of Idaho murderer after prior representation of a victim's parent doesn't constitute a violation of conflict of interest rules, but the case prompts ethical questions about navigating client conflicts in small-town criminal defense and big-city corporate law alike, say Hilary Gerzhoy and Charles Loeser at HWG.

• Employer Tips As EEOC Urges Return To Low Retaliation Bar

  

  In light of recent U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission pressure on courts to return to the low employer retaliation threshold the U.S. Supreme Court set in Burlington Northern v. White in 2006, companies should take precautionary measures before considering disciplinary actions against employees, say Denise Giraudo and Maryam Gueye at Sheppard Mullin.

• The Discipline George Santos Would Face If He Were A Lawyer

  

  Rep. George Santos, who has become a national punchline for his alleged lies, hasn't faced many consequences yet, but if he were a lawyer, even his nonwork behavior would be regulated by the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and violations in the past have led to sanctions and even disbarment, says Mark Hinderks at Stinson.

• A Litigation Move That Could Conserve Discovery Resources

  

  Bennett Rawicki at Hilgers Graben proposes the preliminary legal opinion procedure — seeking a court's opinion on a disputed legal standard at the outset, rather than the close, of discovery — as a useful resource-preservation tool for legally complex, discovery-intensive litigation.

• Litigators Should Approach AI Tools With Caution

  

  Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT hold potential to streamline various aspects of the litigation process, resulting in improved efficiency and outcomes, but should be carefully double-checked for confidentiality, plagiarism and accuracy concerns, say Zachary Foster and Melanie Kalmanson at Quarles & Brady.

• How Proposed BOEM Regs Will Boost Offshore Wind Projects

  

  Newly proposed offshore wind project regulations from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management represent a substantial regulatory shift that will improve transparency around the timing of lease auctions, streamline approval and oversight for projects in development, and provide needed guidance for future projects, say attorneys at K&L Gates.

• Strategies For Cos. Navigating NY Digital Fair Repair Act

  

  New York's recently enacted Digital Fair Repair Act requires original equipment manufacturers for electronic devices to provide diagnostic and repair information to both consumers and independent repair shops, so companies should prepare strategies to overcome compliance challenges regarding copyright and end user license agreements, say attorneys at Carter Ledyard.

• 5 Ways Attorneys Can Use Emotion In Client Pitches

  

  Lawyers are skilled at using their high emotional intelligence to build rapport with clients, so when planning your next pitch, consider how you can create some emotional peaks, personal connections and moments of magic that might help you stick in prospective clients' minds and seal the deal, says consultant Diana Kander.