The dismissal of a sexual abuse lawsuit against a U.S. Army hospital was upheld by the Eighth Circuit on Friday after it determined that the federal government is immune to claims that the hospital should have known of a priest’s history of sexual abuse allegations.
A Florida appeals court on Friday revived a suit brought by a former prison guard accusing a doctor of releasing his medical records to state prison officials in an employment matter without his consent, saying it should be up to a jury to decide a factual dispute.
A man who was injured in a scuffle as he walked in on a murder-suicide is urging Pennsylvania's highest court to uphold a decision finding that Erie Insurance Exchange was responsible for the cost of defending the gunman's estate in a lawsuit over the incident.
An insurance company has asked a California federal court to grant a quick win in its suit against a policy-holding photography company because exclusions in the coverage mean it doesn't have to pay for a drone incident at a wedding shoot during which a guest lost an eye.
A Georgia jury on Thursday found that Atlanta's transit system's negligence was responsible for a fall by a disabled passenger who was getting off a bus that left her in a permanent vegetative state, and awarded the rider $18.75 million.
Four of the dozens of victims of a Seattle “duck boat” crash at the heart of an ongoing trial have reached an $8.25 million settlement with amphibious vehicle tour company Ride the Ducks International and its Seattle licensee, the individuals' attorney announced Friday.
The Pittsburgh Pirates reached a settlement with a woman injured by a foul ball at PNC Park in 2015, attorneys said Friday, but a jury trial under a new judge in state court scheduled to get underway Wednesday will determine the liability of the company that installed the allegedly defective safety netting behind home plate.
The federal government asked the Fourth Circuit on Thursday to toss a West Virginia federal judge's $7.1 million award in a suit accusing a federally employed doctor of botching a newborn’s treatment that caused brain damage, saying the award should have been reduced because of a previous settlement.
The captain of an amphibious “duck boat” that sank in a Missouri lake in July, killing 17 people, was charged in federal court on Thursday after prosecutors said he failed to take necessary safety precautions or warn the passengers to put on their life jackets.
An Illinois appeals court on Wednesday tossed claims filed against a hospital in a suit accusing a doctor of failing to timely remove a woman’s kidney stone that caused serious injuries, saying because the doctor is an independent contractor the hospital can’t be held liable.
The company that installed safety netting at the Pittsburgh Pirates’ PNC Park wants a new state court judge for the upcoming case of a woman injured by a foul ball behind home plate, alleging improper communication between the current judge and one of the woman’s attorneys.
Evanston Insurance Co. on Wednesday asked a California federal court to rule that it has no further obligation to defend or indemnify Monterey County or the operator of a Salinas-based racetrack in a lawsuit over a motorcycle accident at the track, saying the claims are outside the scope of its policy.
A Florida jury has cleared a former Miami Dolphins team doctor in a suit brought by ex-player Otis “O.J.” McDuffie accusing him of negligence in failing to properly treat a toe injury that McDuffie says derailed his career.
One of Florida's largest public health systems urged the state's highest court Wednesday to reverse two lower courts' rulings striking down a law authorizing it to establish liens to recover medical services costs, but the court appeared skeptical of the hospital's argument that its patient contracts are public contracts, making the liens legal.
A reduced $4 million award in a medical malpractice suit was largely upheld after a Texas appeals court ruled Wednesday that a prior settlement offsets the award before the state’s cap on pain and suffering damages is applied.
A Tennessee federal jury on Wednesday sided with a group of workers and their families that alleged Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.'s work cleaning up a 2008 fly ash spill didn't adhere to health requirements, potentially causing a range of injuries including lung cancer.
A Florida federal magistrate judge Tuesday recommended confirmation of an arbitration award in a case by a former Norwegian Cruise Lines steward who said the company refused to pay for spinal surgery allegedly related to an incident aboard ship, saying the court must give considerable leeway to the arbitrator.
A Montana federal jury has found that BNSF Railway Co. violated a federal railway safety law and fired a conductor for reporting an on-the-job injury, awarding the man more than $2 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
A Louisiana appellate court Wednesday revived a suit by a lawyer convicted of assaulting a district attorney, which alleges that the convicted attorney was not the one who started the altercation and was in fact the person who was injured.
Former football players suffering from long-term brain injuries discovered years after their playing days cleared a major hurdle to pursuing claims against professional leagues and universities last week when the Ohio Supreme Court allowed a CTE lawsuit from a deceased Notre Dame student to move forward.
In this series featuring law school luminaries, Yale Law School lecturer and Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Linda Greenhouse discusses her coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, the conservatives' long game and trends in journalism.
Attorneys should think beyond the Veterans Day parades and use their time and talents to help the many veterans facing urgent legal issues, says Linda Klein of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC.
The decision last month by Baker McKenzie’s global chairman to step down due to exhaustion indicates that the legal profession needs to mount a broader wellness effort to address long hours, high stress, frequent travel and the daily demands of practice, says Leesa Klepper, director of Thrivewell Coaching.
On Election Day, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in a case addressing whether payment to a railroad employee for time lost from work is subject to employment taxes. The technicalities of statutory interpretation won’t be front page news, but will affect thousands of cases each year, say attorneys at Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP.
By 2030, it is possible that 75 percent of lawyers practicing in the U.S. will be millennials. A broadened focus on retention and advancement of all young lawyers is therefore a logical step forward but it fails to address another major retention issue that law firms should explore, says Susan Smith Blakely of LegalPerspectives LLC.
While the California Supreme Court has held that summary judgment is no longer a disfavored remedy, two recent California Court of Appeal decisions demonstrate a continuing ambivalence concerning a trial court’s discretion to grant summary judgment, say attorneys with Horvitz & Levy LLP.
Former U.S. Attorney for the District of Idaho Wendy Olson discusses her decades of experience prosecuting white collar crimes and civil rights violations, her work and challenges as U.S. attorney, and her move to private practice.
As autonomous vehicle technology advances rapidly, there remains much to be done in a legislative context to prepare for the future. The Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 is the first legislative step the government of the United Kingdom has taken to pave the way for autonomous vehicles, says Michaela Herron of Bristows LLP.
Anthony Thompson’s "Dangerous Leaders: How and Why Lawyers Must Be Taught to Lead" explores the conflict many lawyers face when charged with the responsibility of leadership. The book is an excellent read for all lawyers, says U.S. District Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown of the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Trial lawyers are frequently taught that they should appear invisible during direct examination — that their job is merely to prompt the witness to start speaking. But the most powerful direct examinations are the ones in which the examiner, not the witness, is controlling the pace, say attorneys with Kobre & Kim LLP.