The Third Circuit refused Wednesday to disturb a victory for investment advisers in beating a proposed class action over mutual fund management fees, saying a district court properly found that the shareholders behind the suit failed to show the fees were excessive for the services provided.
A New Jersey federal judge has ruled that a state law capping damages for charities at $250,000 applies to a federally funded health clinic facing a medical malpractice suit over the death of a newborn.
The Third Circuit on Wednesday shot down a higher damages bid by a man who alleged he was exposed to a dangerous chemical from a Conrail freight train derailment, ruling that a lower court properly found that his expert witness didn’t proffer reliable evidence that his cancer risk increased.
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a rock wall parts manufacturer is not on the hook for attorneys’ fees in a product liability action under the so-called offer-of-judgment rule after its share of a liability verdict fell below the proposed settlement amount.
A former NBA player has called on a New Jersey federal court to throw out his conviction and nine-year prison sentence for bilking real estate investors out of more than $2 million in a Ponzi scheme, citing allegedly ineffective legal assistance by his former attorney and purportedly false testimony by government witnesses.
The Third Circuit on Tuesday affirmed the April 2016 convictions of two top officials from the now-defunct NOVA Bank for defrauding the Troubled Asset Relief Program in a ruling that also upheld an 11-month prison term for the bank's former chairman.
This global law firm has recently focused on creating opportunities for people with disabilities across its ranks, and its efforts are already showing results.
A New Jersey federal judge ordered an Italian engineering contractor to arbitrate its defamation lawsuit against a U.S. manufacturer of steam condensers, rejecting arguments that the dispute stemming from a power plant project fell outside an underlying arbitration clause.
The Third Circuit on Tuesday revived a lawsuit by the parents of an epileptic girl who claim a Pennsylvania school discriminated against her by barring her service dog, clarifying in a precedential decision that the trial court erred in its application of federal disabilities laws in instructions to jurors who had ruled in the school’s favor.
New Jersey expanded its public-private partnership capabilities beyond the education sector Tuesday, as Gov. Phil Murphy signed legislation that allows any government entity within the Garden State to team up with private companies on projects that will benefit the public.
A New Jersey federal judge Tuesday nixed a putative class action against CVS Pharmacy Inc. for allegedly violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by notifying customers about the availability of flu shots via text messages, finding that the messages fell under the so-called “health care exemption.”
A New Jersey municipal judge facing ethics charges over “condescending” emails she sent to colleagues over scheduling issues in a drunk driving case has been hit with a lawsuit by a former municipal prosecutor who claims the jurist’s communications amounted to a hostile work environment.
A wholesale distributor of wigs and other beauty products cannot force an AIG insurer to cover its losses from the theft of a shipment of human hair weaves in 2014, a New Jersey appellate court affirmed on Tuesday, finding that the plain terms of the company’s policy preclude coverage.
The Third Circuit on Tuesday partially revived the claims of victims of asbestos-related ailments against the insurers of bankrupt mining company W.R. Grace & Co., saying the insurers may bear direct liability for the asbestos exposure.
A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday spared a former police chief prison time for taking pay for off-duty security officer work he never performed in a public housing project, but sternly told him his actions weren't a mistake, as he had characterized them, but an intentional crime.
The New Jersey Supreme Court found Tuesday that a family-owned horticultural business violated the state’s Agriculture Retention and Development Act by removing premier soil on preserved farmland to build greenhouses, reversing a ruling that said further findings were needed to determine if the company ruined the land.
One of the country’s highest-profile litigators, the Boies Schiller Flexner LLP chairman was diagnosed with dyslexia when he was in his 30s. In an interview with Law360, he talks about practicing law with the learning disability.
Sometimes viewed as an “invisible” disability, mental illness has long been forced under wraps because of the risk attorneys could face bias and stigma. Here’s how lawyers, law firms and other groups are starting to take on the status quo.
Dozens of states slammed a bid by drugmakers and distributor McKesson Corp. to dismiss claims that they fueled the opioid crisis, telling an Ohio federal judge who is overseeing the opioid multidistrict litigation that a state's ability to protect the health of its citizens must not be restricted.
A New Jersey federal judge on Monday sent back to state court a putative class action against Six Flags Great Adventure LLC over claims the amusement park’s credit and debit card receipts exposed patrons to identity theft, saying the remand was required since the court did not have subject matter jurisdiction due to a customer’s lack of standing.
In the Accutane litigation, the New Jersey Supreme Court just unanimously upgraded the state’s standards for admission of expert testimony. This decision may finally break the back of the long-running — and scientifically bogus — Accutane litigation that has plagued New Jersey courts, says James Beck of Reed Smith LLP.
I clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg before the days of RBG bobbleheads and “You Can’t Spell Truth Without Ruth” T-shirts. I had no idea I would become a judge, and I feel lucky every day that I had the chance to learn from her, says California Supreme Court Justice Goodwin Liu.
In this article, David Dorner and Brent Beissel of Reed Smith LLP focus on some noteworthy sales and use tax law changes, cases, rulings and secondary legal guidance, as well as review a newly filed New Jersey corporate income tax case involving transfer pricing adjustments to the payments under an intercompany aircraft lease.
A lot has changed since I clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg 20 years ago. At that time, I had hair and no wife. I also thought I knew everything — but working for the justice made me realize very quickly that I actually knew very little, says Ninth Circuit Judge John Owens.
In 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court, and I began my two-year clerkship with her. In her first opinion as a justice, and in dozens since, Justice Ginsburg reminded us how the law needs to operate if equality is to be a reality, says Margo Schlanger, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School.
As a result of waning federal involvement, states have increased their roles in the regulation and litigation of private student loans, and servicers and lenders now confront an amorphous environment policed by a diverse cast. And with student loan defaults rising, state enforcement activities may not be the only increase in litigation the industry sees, say attorneys at Troutman Sanders LLP.
No matter how often New Jersey trial judges deny condo associations the right to recover reasonable attorneys' fees from delinquent units, the state appeals court will continue to reverse their decisions, says David Byrne of Ansell Grimm & Aaron PC.
In June, the New Jersey Appellate Division brought sweeping changes to the method by which asbestos defendants may prove cross-claims at trial. New limits on the use of prior testimony mean that defendants must now call live witnesses, and will lead to longer, more costly trials, say attorneys with Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP.
Following a substantial tax hike related to the virtual elimination of the state tax deduction on the federal level, New Jersey taxpayers will need to immediately evaluate the impact of the new laws contained within the recently passed New Jersey budget since many have already taken effect. Some of the most adversely affected taxpayers will have a further incentive to move out of New Jersey, say Jeffrey Schechter and Reuben Muller of Cole Schotz PC.
In Lamps Plus v. Varela, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide next term whether an arbitration agreement that says nothing about class arbitration can be interpreted to constitute consent by the parties. But it's currently unclear if the Supreme Court will specify who can actually decide that question, says Gilbert Samberg of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC.