The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear a case from former Robert Half International Inc. workers challenging a ruling by the Third Circuit that the staffing agency could address overtime claims in individual arbitration rather than on a classwide basis, according to its Monday order list.
A New Jersey federal magistrate judge on Friday granted a consumer’s request to transfer to Utah federal court her proposed class action alleging "superfood" juice maker MonaVie Inc. promotes bogus health drinks through a predatory pyramid scheme, ruling a change in circumstances since the suit’s filing warrants transfer.
A New Jersey hospital and a pediatrician have been hit with a $17 million judgment after a state court jury found they were negligent in treating a child who visited the facility in 2008 with pneumonia and left with a brain injury, lawyers in the case said Monday.
A Manhattan judge on Monday hit a Jackson, New Jersey, pastor with a five-year prison sentence for accepting bribes in a scheme to hand control of a small credit union he controlled to a fraudster who had been looking for a way to process shady bitcoin transactions.
A New Jersey state judge has been accused of “explosive fits of rage,” “extreme emotional immaturity,” and “bizarre and uncomfortable” conduct toward his then-law clerk, a supervising jurist said in a certification filed in federal court Friday.
The New Jersey Sierra Club on Friday announced its second challenge to a controversial plan for a 30-mile pipeline that includes the ecologically sensitive Pinelands region in its route, arguing that the plan violates state environmental rules because the system wouldn’t even primarily serve that area.
Patients suing Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. over its alleged failure to warn about potential femoral fractures from its osteoporosis drug Fosamax have urged the Supreme Court to keep the multidistrict litigation alive, saying the Third Circuit properly determined the U.S. Food and Drug Administration took issue with the words “stress fracture."
The owner of athletics-themed clothing brand Rare Breed told a New Jersey federal court Thursday it could lose important potential partnerships if Rutgers University and an assistant football coach aren’t forced to stop using logos it says are virtually identical to its own.
A New Jersey lawmaker sued Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino on Thursday in New Jersey state court in a bid for documents related to a settled whistleblower case filed by a former prosecutor who alleged he was fired for complaining that a public corruption indictment was dropped for political reasons.
An Old West theme park in New Jersey lost its bid Friday to resume using a well for drinking water when a state appeals court said an environmental agency properly ordered that the well be used for nonpotable purposes or decommissioned after the water tested positive for E. coli.
The New Jersey Supreme Court has agreed to halt a shore reconstruction project involving three Long Beach Island parcels while homeowners fight a decision allowing their municipality to condemn portions of their properties to create a public walkway, which the residents say is a governmental overreach.
General Nutrition Corp. intentionally discriminated against a store manager in his 50s when it fired him because of his age, a New Jersey federal jury found Thursday.
Wells Fargo doesn’t have to face racial bias claims brought by three bankers it says it fired for opening accounts without authorization and falsifying time records, a New Jersey federal judge ruled Friday, saying the workers’ claims are undercut by the fact that they were replaced by individuals of the same racial and ethnic mix.
Nightingale Properties is reportedly paying between $130 million and $140 million for a New York office and retail development project, TD Bank and Lakeland Bank are said to have loaned a combined $50 million for a New Jersey multifamily project, and developer Izek Shomof has reportedly dropped $18 million on a Los Angeles-area hotel.
The New Jersey federal judge presiding over the bribery trial of Sen. Bob Menendez and a Florida ophthalmologist battled Thursday with defense lawyers over their bid for a mistrial on the grounds that he has stopped them from presenting evidence and telling their side of the story.
Cooper Industries is entitled to coverage under several of a predecessor's insurance policies for any liability it incurs in connection with environmental remediation efforts along the Passaic River, a New Jersey judge has ruled.
The New Jersey Supreme Court declined to review a lower court’s decision that a 2012 settlement resolving a Jersey City zoning dispute was binding on future municipal officials, letting stand a finding that local redevelopment projects must be allowed to traverse municipal administrations under state law.
A New Jersey judge has ordered Occidental Chemical Corp. to pay Spanish oil giant Repsol SA $65 million to cover its settlement with state environmental regulators over the cleanup of decades-old pollution in the Passaic River, ending the companies’ 12-year court battle.
The New Jersey Appellate Division ruled in a published decision Thursday that a tenant who agreed to purchase a property that was pending sale to another buyer didn’t owe the sales broker commission because there was no enforceable contract between the tenant and broker.
Sanofi filed a patent infringement suit Tuesday in New Jersey federal court alleging Mylan’s planned generic version of Sanofi’s insulin pen, Lantus, infringes 18 of its patents.
A federal judge recently said “show me” when 83 plaintiffs from 30 different states claimed personal jurisdiction in Missouri over a New Jersey-based talcum powder manufacturer. This ruling appears to be part of a trend that will likely lead to less talc-related litigation tourism in Missouri, says Steven Boranian of Reed Smith LLP.
Is the rising spate of opioid litigation comparable to the litigation that led to the mega-billion dollar settlement with Big Tobacco? According to ex-trial lawyer Richard Scruggs, who helped engineer the $248 billion tobacco settlement in the 1990s, the answer is "sort of."
Although the Trump administration has completed the vetting and confirmation of a cabinet and White House staff, thousands of senior positions remain unfilled throughout the executive branch. More than ever, people selected for those posts find themselves under close scrutiny, say Adam Raviv and Reginald Brown of WilmerHale.
In recent years, more and more private companies have been adopting parental benefit policies. However, as demonstrated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's recent suit against Estée Lauder, the agency is focusing on alleged disparities in employers’ parental benefit policies, and good intentions can lead to unintended consequences, says Debra Friedman of Cozen O'Connor.
As businesses and insurers sort out the impacts of Hurricane Harvey, businesses located far from the Lone Star State may choose to assert contingent business interruption claims under their own first-party property policies, says Shannon O'Malley of Zelle LLP.
Last month, New York state revoked a doctor's medical license based on a vague order issued by the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners that potentially accused the doctor of sexual misconduct. The nationwide pressure to dumb down such orders is one of the reasons why sexual predation upon patients has been so difficult to root out, says Thomas Keech, consultant to the Maryland State Board of Physicians.
Five years ago, John Nevius of Anderson Kill PC wrote a Law360 article addressing the risks that followed in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. Today, those tasked with assessing and mitigating the enormous destruction wrought by Harvey and Irma will benefit from the late Nevius' analysis, which his colleague Robert Horkovich discusses in this update.
In our recent survey of business of law professionals, nearly half of respondents said that who they collaborate with, inside their law firm, is different from five years ago, says Chris Cartrett of legal software provider Aderant.
States are continuing to assert claims against the federal government over unredeemed federal savings bonds under their respective unclaimed property statutes. Billions of dollars are at stake, and recent decisions from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims appear to have breathed new life into the claims, say attorneys with Eversheds Sutherland.
The range of possible and better fee agreements is wide. But such alternatives will become popular only if litigants confront the psychological tendencies shaping their existing fee arrangements, says J.B. Heaton, a partner at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP.