North Carolina has asked the state Supreme Court to review a trial court ruling finding racial bias tainted the jury selection at a Black man's capital murder trial, saying the man's case was rendered moot in December when the outgoing governor commuted his sentence, according to a petition filed Monday.
The state argued in the petition that North Carolina Superior Court Judge Wayland J. Sermons, Jr., erred in declining to dismiss as moot a motion the defendant, Hasson Jamaal Bacote, filed in 2010 to challenge his death sentence under the North Carolina's Racial Justice Act, or RJA, after Gov. Roy Cooper commuted the sentence to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole on Dec 31.
Bacote's case could impact over 100 other people facing the death penalty in North Carolina who have pending RJA claims.
Attorneys with North Carolina's Justice Department told the state high court that the governor's act of clemency had already granted the only relief available to Bacote under the statute — life without parole — making the defendant's motion moot. In February, Judge Sermons rejected the mootness argument, holding that the governor's commutation did not negate the need to adjudicate systemic racial discrimination claims.
"The trial court erred by refusing to dismiss Defendant's moot claims and by instead issuing a 120-page opinion on the merits of those claims," the petition says.
A jury convicted Bacote of first-degree murder in April 2009 for killing Anthony Surles, and unanimously recommended a death sentence.
In 2010, while his appeal was pending in the state Supreme Court, Bacote filed a motion under RJA, which provided a pathway to people on death row to seek life without parole if they could prove that their cases were significantly sullied by racial prejudice. The law was repealed in 2013, but a subsequent North Carolina Supreme Court ruling clarified that courts were allowed to adjudicate claims that were already pending under it.
Bacote argued his prosecutors violated the law when they used peremptory strikes disproportionately against Black jurors.
On Feb 7, more than a month after Bacote's sentence had already been commuted, Judge Sermons vacated his death sentence and resentenced him to life without parole, citing significant statistical and anecdotal evidence of racial bias.
Judge Sermons gave particular weight to the testimony of Michigan State University College of Law Professor Barbara O'Brien, who found that Bacote's prosecutors struck Black jurors at 3.3 times the rate of others.
In addition, Bacote's lead prosecutor, Gregory C. Butler, had a documented history of racialized language against Black defendants, including Bacote, whom he called "a thug" — a term he conceded has racial connotations — and described as "cold-hearted and without remorse" in front of the jury.
In his order, Judge Sermons also pointed to evidence showing that, in Johnston County, from 1970 to 2011, Black defendants were more than twice as likely to receive a death sentence as whites, and that Black defendants had a 100% chance of receiving a death sentence when charged with felony murder. And rejecting the state's mootness argument, the judge opined that each motion filed under the RJA "should be handled separately, individually, and on the basis of their facts."
"A death sentence tainted by race ... harms defendants and impugns the legitimacy of the criminal punishment system as a whole," Judge Sermons said in the order.
North Carolina, which separately informed North Carolina's high court that it would appeal Judge Sermons' order under the state's procedural law, told the court on Monday that it was filing the certiorari petition "out of an abundance of caution" to ensure that the court would review the case.
"If this Court concludes the State lacks a statutory right to appeal or that the State's appeal is otherwise defective, it should exercise its discretionary authority to review the trial court's erroneous orders," the petition says.
Attorneys representing the state did not immediately reply to a request for comments. Bacote's attorney declined to comment.
The state is represented by Joan M. Cunningham, Jonathan Babb, M Ben Szany, Nicholaos Vlahos, and Heidi M. Williams of the North Carolina Department of Justice.
Bacote is represented by Jay H. Ferguson of Thomas Ferguson & Beskind LLP, Cassandra Stubbs and Henderson Hill of the American Civil Liberties Union, and Shelagh Kenney and Kailey Morgan of the Center for Death Penalty Litigation.
The case is State of North Carolina v. Hasson Jamaal Bacote, case number 360A09-2, in the Supreme Court of North Carolina.
--Additional reporting by Hayley Fowler. Editing by Vaqas Asghar.
Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Law360
|The Practice of Law
Access to Justice
Aerospace & Defense
Appellate
Asset Management
Banking
Bankruptcy
Benefits
California
Cannabis
Capital Markets
Class Action
Colorado
Commercial Contracts
Competition
Compliance
Connecticut
Construction
Consumer Protection
Corporate
Criminal Practice
Cybersecurity & Privacy
Delaware
Employment
Energy
Environmental
Fintech
Florida
Food & Beverage
Georgia
Government Contracts
Health
Hospitality
Illinois
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Trade
Legal Ethics
Legal Industry
Life Sciences
Massachusetts
Media & Entertainment
Mergers & Acquisitions
Michigan
Native American
Law360 Pulse
|Business of Law
Law360 Authority
|Deep News & Analysis
Healthcare Authority
Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & ComplianceGlobal
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
This article has been saved to your Briefcase
This article has been added to your Saved Articles
NC Fights Bias Finding In Death Row Case After Clemency
By Marco Poggio | April 9, 2025, 4:20 PM EDT · Listen to article