We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Feature

SEC Case Exposes Justices' Rift Over 'Legislative History'

Law360, Washington (February 22, 2018, 8:51 PM EST) -- The Supreme Court’s long-running tensions over the use of legislative history as a way to interpret law broke out into public view Wednesday in a case over the Dodd-Frank Act’s whistleblower provisions, as Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Clarence Thomas clashed over the value of a Senate report.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg appears to have set off the back-and-forth in her majority opinion in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. Somers, when she relied on a Senate committee report as support for the position that Dodd-Frank only provides...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.