Malice Not Needed To Prove Insurer Bad Faith: Pa. Justices

By Jeff Sistrunk (September 28, 2017, 10:54 AM EDT) -- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Thursday declined to require a showing of intentional ill will or malice in order for policyholders to win the day when pursuing claims of bad faith conduct against insurers, instead finding that ill will is merely a factor in assessing such claims.

The state justices unanimously affirmed a decision by the state's Superior Court concluding that an insurance carrier's motive of self-interest or ill will is merely one factor that can be considered in an analysis of potential bad faith conduct — and the attendant punitive damages that could follow — under Section 8371 of the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!