A Pennsylvania-based law firm is facing class claims alleging that notices it sent to consumers about actions against them did not live up to requirements under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
A Pennsylvania appeals court has ordered an en banc rehearing after a three-judge panel ruled in September that a siren manufacturer's registration to do business in the state allowed the Philadelphia County court to preside over hearing-loss claims brought by a group of New York City firefighters.
A state judge has rejected an emergency petition from a group of suburban Philadelphia residents seeking to shut down Sunoco’s controversial Mariner East natural gas pipelines based on what they argued was a clear and present danger to public safety.
State Farm must defend a teenage boy against a lawsuit accusing him of cyberbullying one of his classmates and pushing her to commit suicide, a Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday ordered, saying a home insurance policy held by the boy's mother covers the lawsuit.
The dire conclusions in the blockbuster climate change report recently released by the Trump administration contradict White House efforts to roll back greenhouse gas emissions standards for vehicles and power plants and the proposals should be yanked immediately, dozens of state attorneys general and city and county attorneys said Tuesday.
Federal prosecutors in Pennsylvania announced on Tuesday that they’d inked a $12.5 million settlement with a Lehigh Valley health care network and its CEO over alleged false Medicare and Medicaid claims for orthopedic surgeries.
Venezuela has breached its settlement with Crystallex International Corp. relating to a $1.2 billion arbitral award issued after Venezuela expropriated its investments, the Canadian miner alleged Tuesday, signaling its intent to forge ahead with efforts to seize and sell shares in Citgo Petroleum Corp.'s parent company.
An Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas judge got her second critique from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in as many weeks on Tuesday, when the appellate panel again questioned whether she created an appearance of bias by giving long sentences to sex offenders without apparent justification.
A coalition of 43 state attorneys general urged the Social Security Administration to make a priority of establishing a nationwide database for electronically matching names and dates of birth to Social Security numbers, in order to fight “synthetic identity theft” where legitimate numbers get tied to fake identities.
A Pennsylvania federal judge has shot down a bid to pause a cluster of shareholder lawsuits over alleged overbilling by United Health Services Inc. while both a related securities class action and an investigation into potential False Claims Act violations draw to a conclusion.
GNC knocked down a proposed securities class action accusing the retailer of misleading investors about nutrition supplements that contained unlawful ingredients after the Third Circuit found Tuesday that the plaintiffs have not sufficiently alleged that company executives were knowingly or recklessly deceptive.
The Third Circuit pressed the Federal Trade Commission on Tuesday to show why the court should revive the agency’s antitrust complaint alleging a Shire PLC unit delayed generic competition for a gastrointestinal infection drug through a series of sham regulatory petitions, expressing skepticism that a violation of federal law was “imminent.”
Endo International PLC and several of its executives must face an investor suit alleging the company knowingly misrepresented the safety of its Opana opioid, leading to a significant stock drop when the drug was forcibly removed from the market, after a Pennsylvania federal judge said Monday that the shareholders sufficiently pled their claims.
The Pennsylvania federal court overseeing the landmark NFL concussion settlement appointed a retired judge Monday to serve as a special fraud investigator to dig into allegations that doctors and players were gaming the system, handing the league a quiet win on a request that had been embroiled in a firestorm of controversy just a few months ago.
The Third Circuit ruled Monday that temporary workers brought in to make steel while a specialty metal company locked out its unionized workers didn’t deserve pay for time spent crossing a picket line under the Fair Labor Standards Act, though it revived their Pennsylvania law claim.
A Pennsylvania federal judge largely refused Friday to toss antitrust claims from buyers of Johnson & Johnson immunosuppressant Remicade, concluding that only sham litigation allegations and some state law consumer protection accusations must go while maintaining most of the suit alleging J&J compelled insurers not to cover competing biosimilars.
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation overruled Home Depot’s objections Monday and lumped the retailer’s drywall price-fixing claims into related litigation consolidated in Pennsylvania federal court, finding the tie-in would be the most efficient way to handle the new suit even if the MDL is winding down.
A Sunoco Inc. unit says objectors who have asked Pennsylvania to shut down two pipelines for transporting liquid natural gas couldn't prove that the pipelines were sufficiently dangerous or that the public lacked sufficient information about them, according to a brief filed Friday with the state's Public Utility Commission.
A retailer of women’s fashion and accessories has agreed to pay $3.5 million to settle a systemic U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission investigation into the company’s handling of accommodations for pregnant employees and workers with disabilities, the agency announced Monday.
Members First Federal Credit Union is facing class claims in Pennsylvania state court over its alleged practice of systematically charging overdraft fees on customers even if they have not actually overdrawn their accounts.
In Dittman v. UPMC, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently held that employers storing employee information on internet-accessible computer systems have a common law duty to protect that data from any foreseeable risk of harm, exposing companies in the state to increased liability, say Carol Steinour Young and Sarah Dotzel of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC.
When reading Tim Wu’s new book, "The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age," lawyers, economists and historians will find its broad brush maddening, and the generalist reader will simply be misled, says D.C. Circuit Judge Douglas Ginsburg.
For the first time in 15 years, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, governing class actions, has been amended. There are five key changes that will likely impact future federal class action litigation and settlements, say John Lavelle and Terese Schireson of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.
Many of the issues that are most likely to draw the attention of state lawmakers next year — including cybersecurity, internet and data privacy, blockchain and cryptocurrencies, sales taxes on remote sellers, transportation and telecommunications infrastructure, and marijuana — are already familiar, says Korey Clark of State Net Capitol Journal.
Recent tax decisions in Pennsylvania and Michigan highlight taxing authorities' unsuccessful attempts to assert sales and use tax on products and services that use new technologies not contemplated by old taxing statutes, say Craig Fields and Rebecca Balinskas of Morrison & Foerster LLP.
Plaintiffs in the Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing multidistrict litigation were subject to different states' statutes of limitations. But whether you bleed Michigan blue or you live where a grizzly bear is your only neighbor, preemption unites us all, says Michelle Hart Yeary of Dechert LLP.
As the dissenting judge pointed out, the Third Circuit majority's recent opinion in Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp. — restricting the impossibility preemption defense for federally regulated manufacturers — seemed to be more focused on perceived public policy considerations than strict adherence to case law, says Jonathan Skowron of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP.
Permitting jurors to submit written questions, or even to pose questions orally to witnesses on the stand, advances several important goals and promotes both fairness and efficiency, says Matthew Wright of McCarter & English LLP.
The California Supreme Court's recent decision in Sheppard Mullin v. J-M Manufacturing has cast doubt on arbitration clauses in attorney engagement agreements, jeopardizing the efficient resolution of malpractice claims and fee disputes, say Sharon Ben-Shahar Mayer and Mark Drooks of Bird Marella Boxer Wolpert Nessim Drooks Lincenberg & Rhow PC.
Attorneys at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Perkins Coie LLP and the Healthcare Association of New York State reflect on lessons they learned the hard way when transitioning to in-house counsel positions.