President Donald Trump on Tuesday nominated Tenth Circuit Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill a Supreme Court seat that has remained vacant since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016, picking a well-respected figure in the conservative legal establishment who would restore the nation’s top bench to a Republican majority and likely break the recent spate of 4-4 ties.
One lawsuit in a bitter family dispute over the Tony Luke's brand was dismissed Monday when a New Jersey federal judge ruled that a business agreement barred trademark claims brought by one son against the patriarch who founded the Philadelphia-based sandwich empire.
A Philadelphia jury on Tuesday pinned blame on the Salvation Army and a property owner for a fatal demolition accident that saw a four-story wall collapse onto a neighboring thrift store operated by the charity.
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday denied a temporary restraining order to a proposed class of American Airlines pilots who sought to prevent the airline from implementing a new integrated seniority list as a consequence of its merger with US Airways.
The Third Circuit on Monday upheld an injunction ordering that a group of young immigrants be allowed to transfer to a different Pennsylvania public school to better accommodate their needs to learn English as a second language.
After a four-day jury trial in Pennsylvania federal court, a Philadelphia-area hospital has won a medical-malpractice suit claiming that a botched delivery and the use of the drug Pitocin caused shoulder dystocia and neurological damage in the baby.
The Third Circuit on Monday upheld a judgment against a proposed collective action of Robert Half International Inc. workers, saying the district court got it right when it that found that the staffing agency can address employees’ overtime claims in individual arbitration, rather than on a classwide basis.
A suburban Philadelphia attorney was disbarred by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Monday after he was found to have misappropriated or otherwise mishandled hundreds of thousands of dollars in client funds.
More than 40 states suing Indivior PLC in a Pennsylvania federal court over allegations of delaying the introduction of a generic competitor to Suboxone argued Monday that a recent Third Circuit decision on product hopping does not support dismissing the suit.
Independent and chain pharmacies that have accused Medco and other pharmacy benefit managers of suppressing competition by paying them less than chains for drug sales in multidistrict litigation asked a Pennsylvania federal judge Monday to rethink denying them class certification.
Customers Bank urged a Pennsylvania judge on Monday to dismiss a $100 million lawsuit lodged by the developer of a scrapped suburban Philadelphia medical campus alleging that he was targeted with frivolous federal racketeering claims.
StarKist Co. accused a Mexican company of ripping off its iconic cartoon fish man, Charlie the Tuna, with its own anthropomorphic sea figure that will confuse shoppers into thinking the canned fish flakes are Charlie-endorsed, according to a trademark infringement suit filed Friday.
A Pennsylvania federal jury is poised to begin deliberating whether a state senator bribed a local Democratic party figure to support his pursuit of a Philadelphia ward leader position, after the judge presiding over the case declined to scrap the indictment on Monday.
A Pennsylvania federal jury on Friday awarded a couple $14.5 million following a medical malpractice trial, finding that an obstetrician provided negligent medical care that caused a baby’s brain damage, cerebral palsy and other permanent ailments.
A group of American Airlines pilots launched a class action on Friday alleging that they received the short end of the stick in arbitration proceedings aimed at determining seniority as the workforce integrated with pilots brought on board following the company’s merger with US Airways.
A Pennsylvania judge on Friday approved a Philadelphia attorney’s undisclosed settlement with a Chinese restaurant, resolving allegations that she was sickened by the Chinatown restaurant, which hosted a banquet held by a Temple University Beasley School of Law student group, just days before the dispute was to go to trial.
The Third Circuit ruled in a published opinion Friday that a lower court erred by allowing a grand jury to view an email from a Pennsylvania man facing a federal indictment over a $688 million payday loan scheme, finding attorney-client privilege applies because the email didn't spur fraudulent activities.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has misled a Pennsylvania federal court about its plans to refile a pay-for-delay lawsuit against Watson Laboratories Inc. to dodge questions about its authority to bring the suit, and the court should consider claims challenging that authority, Watson said Friday.
Duane Morris LLP urged a Pennsylvania judge on Friday to toss a $625 million legal malpractice suit that alleged the firm wrongfully ditched its client’s appeal over a collapsed $175 million deal to install a fiber optic cable from Miami to countries in the Caribbean, saying the firm never agreed to represent the plaintiff.
The Third Circuit on Thursday said scoring permission to amend a suit doesn’t excuse stuffing an earlier complaint with misleading claims, affirming about $116,000 in sanctions against an attorney who propped up an age bias suit without evidence against energy company PPL Corp. and a union.
Women leave law firms for many of the same reasons men do, but also face challenges including headwinds with respect to assignment delegation and social outings, as well as potential disruptions if they choose to have children. Firms can increase investment in talent management and improve retention and engagement of women attorneys, says Anusia Gillespie of Banava Consulting.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent ruling in Rost v. Ford Motor Co. leaves asbestos defendants — especially low-dose asbestos defendants — in a precarious situation in the state. The court appears to have approved conclusory opinions as satisfaction of a plaintiff’s burden to establish substantial factor causation, and sanctioned the trial court’s improper consolidation of unrelated same-disease asbestos cases without conseque... (continued)
We are privileged to be part of an employment market that hosts employees from various generations. While “differences” may imply inherent conflict, intergenerational differences can actually be used to an advantage for organizations — especially law firms, say Najmeh Mahmoudjafari, founder of ImmigraTrust Law, and William Martucci of Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP.
The first paragraph of Philip Hirschkop’s obituary is going to contain the word "Loving." That’s undeniable. But many of Hirschkop’s other cases are just as groundbreaking in their own right. They aren’t household names like Loving, but they have affected millions in the nation’s households, says Randy Maniloff of White and Williams LLP.
Whether or not courts regard multiple acts, errors, omissions or claims as interrelated or related is very fact-specific and highly dependent on the language of the policy in question. In the second part of this article, Rory Jurman and Steven Cula primarily explore how Florida courts have interpreted related claim provisions.
When advising employers on the use of payroll card programs as an alternative method of paying employees there are several considerations lawyers should adopt. Kevin Vance of Duane Morris LLP discusses key issues concerning payroll cards and best practices for establishing and maintaining a payroll card program.
As law firms and clients conduct more business on a regional or national scale, multijurisdictional practice is becoming more prevalent for practicing attorneys. Attorneys engaged in both private practice and as in-house counsel need to be aware of the ethical risks of practicing across jurisdictions — including the implications of engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, say Melinda Gentile and Monique Cardenas of Peckar & Abramson PC.
It is increasingly necessary for law firms to implement strategies to improve efficiency, staffing and value to meet client needs. Haley Altman, CEO and co-founder of Doxly Inc., discusses how to successfully leverage analytical tools and emerging technology to increase profitability.
Face it, the American jury system is dying. The arguments Professor Suja Thomas makes in her new book deserve consideration by everyone interested in how our government actually works and how it might recapture the unifying communitarian experience of direct democracy and actual trial by one’s peers, says U.S. District Court Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts.
The Federal Trade Commission recently succeeded on appeal in two hospital merger challenges, in the Third and Seventh Circuits. Hospitals evaluating merging with nearby competitors should keep in mind the analytical approaches laid out in these decisions, say David Kully and Christopher Carmichael of Holland & Knight LLP.