A Louisiana state appellate court has revived a woman’s suit against a New Orleans hospital over the way it allegedly failed to provide for her mother during Hurricane Katrina, ruling that the woman should be allowed more discovery time to find an expert to support her claims.
Sam's Club again lost its challenge to a $1 million verdict for a customer left scarred and limping after injuring her leg at a New Jersey store, with a state appeals court saying Thursday that the business failed to show the award constitutes a miscarriage of justice.
The Virginia Supreme Court on Thursday overturned a jury verdict which found a doctor liable for injuries suffered by a woman due to an alleged botched hysterectomy, saying the patient failed to present any evidence at trial that the doctor proximately caused her injury.
A Texas doctor who is facing an investigation into his care of three patients has asked the state Supreme Court to hear his constitutional challenge to billing record subpoenas issued by the state medical board.
A California jury awarded nearly $53 million on Wednesday to a pair of brothers whose pickup truck was hit by the driver of a CRST Inc. commercial truck that crossed over the center line of a two-lane highway.
Omni Hotels asked the First Circuit on Wednesday to reconsider the court’s decision to revive a man's suit accusing the company of negligence in an assault he suffered in a hotel lobby, saying circuit judges erred in accepting "inadmissible hearsay" and speculation about Omni’s standard of care.
The Third Circuit on Wednesday affirmed a ruling for Windrift Hotel Resort in litigation brought by a woman whose leg was amputated after she contracted sepsis and a bacterial skin infection from raw clams, saying there wasn’t enough evidence that the Jersey Shore establishment was to blame for the allegedly defective food.
Three Pennsylvania attorneys sanctioned for lodging a groundless proposed class action against a surgery center were granted a reprieve from paying approximately $38,000 in penalties after a federal judge halted the case on Wednesday pending a Third Circuit appeal.
Several former prisoners of Iraq’s notorious Abu Ghraib prison failed to plausibly support direct liability claims against a CACI International unit over its employees’ alleged torture and abuse of detainees, but a Virginia federal judge did back their conspiracy and aiding and abetting claims in ruling not to dismiss the suit.
Southwest Surgical Associates and one of its doctors escaped a malpractice suit brought by the family of a woman who died after treatment for a gangrenous left foot, with Texas' First Court of Appeals on Thursday holding that the expert's testimony meant to support the family's claims was insufficient.
A former gymnast sued Michigan State University, its board of directors and USA Gymnastics in Michigan federal court Wednesday, joining others who allege that the school and its administrators failed to protect her and other gymnasts from years of sexual abuse by former orthopedic doctor Larry Nassar.
A Georgia appeals court ruled Wednesday that a criminal homicide case against a doctor is not reason enough to delay a parallel civil case that accuses the doctor of causing a woman's death by overprescribing medications.
A Pennsylvania appeals court issued a published decision Thursday allowing a US Airways flight attendant to receive workers' compensation benefits after she slipped while on a shuttle bus transporting her between a Philadelphia International Airport terminal and a city-owned employee parking lot.
The New Jersey Appellate Division on Thursday denied a trampoline park's bid to force arbitration of claims that a boy was severely injured at the facility, finding that neither an agreement signed by his friend's mother nor a prior agreement signed by his mother were enforceable in the matter.
An Illinois state appeals court on Tuesday revived a suit accusing Motorola Solutions Inc. of exposing workers in Arizona and Texas to toxic substances that purportedly caused their children’s birth defects and other health problems, saying the claims were properly alleged at this stage of the case.
A Massachusetts appellate court ruled Wednesday that a lower court was correct to toss a medical malpractice suit accusing a doctor of botching a woman’s colon removal surgery, finding that the patient was made aware of her injuries more than three years before filing suit.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday cleared the way for a lawsuit against the state’s Department of Transportation over an allegedly dangerous guardrail as it ruled that exemptions to sovereign immunity applied to more than just roadway conditions.
A Kentucky federal judge has tossed a doctor’s constitutional challenge to the authority of the state’s medical licensing board over his temporary suspension based on initial findings that he was “impaired” on the job.
The New Jersey Supreme Court on Wednesday determined that a city and its electrical inspector were fully insulated from claims over a fatal fire purportedly sparked by faulty wiring, reasoning that public entities and employees can’t be held liable for not enforcing the law.
Victims of a 1997 Hamas bombing can’t seize ancient Persian artifacts held by the University of Chicago to satisfy a $71.5 million judgment against Iran, the U.S. Supreme Court held Wednesday in a unanimous decision.
Late last year, the Sedona Conference released the third edition of its principles addressing electronic document production, updated to account for innovations like Snapchat and Twitter. It may be necessary for these principles to be updated more often in order to keep pace with technology, says Charles McGee III of Murphy & McGonigle LLP.
Last week, the District of Delaware raised eyebrows by ruling that documents provided to a litigation funder and its counsel in connection with their due diligence are categorically not attorney work product. Acceleration Bay v. Activision Blizzard seems to be a case of bad facts making bad law, says David Gallagher, investment manager and legal counsel for Bentham IMF.
Artificial intelligence tools can empower attorneys to work more efficiently, deepen and broaden their areas of expertise, and provide increased value to clients, which in turn can improve legal transparency, dispute resolution and access to justice. But there are some common pitfalls already apparent in the legal industry, say Ben Allgrove and Yoon Chae of Baker McKenzie.
Your willingness to let your guard down and render yourself “open” requires an enormous amount of courage. But the impact that vulnerability has on a jury cannot be underestimated, says actor and trial lawyer Michael DeBlis, discussing how tools of the stage can be used by lawyers in the courtroom.
From its architectural grandeur to its relaxed approach to time limits during oral argument, West Virginia’s highest court has many unique features that make it a special place to practice, says Elbert Lin, co-chair of the issues and appeals practice at Hunton & Williams LLP and former solicitor general of West Virginia.
In "Justice and Empathy: Toward a Constitutional Ideal," the late Yale Law School professor Robert Burt makes a compelling case for the undeniable role of the courts in protecting the vulnerable and oppressed. But the question of how the judiciary might conform to Burt’s expectations raises practical problems, says U.S. Circuit Judge Allyson Duncan of the Fourth Circuit.
In the hopes of piquing the interest of jurors and minimizing hardship requests, more and more judges are encouraging parties to make “mini-openings” prior to voir dire. You can use this as an opportunity to identify your worst jurors and get them removed from the panel — by previewing your case weaknesses and withholding your strengths, says Christina Marinakis of Litigation Insights.
Multidistrict litigation is an ever-expanding driver of product liability litigation, but when the MDL process runs its course there is often still a trial to be had, and there are strategic and practical decisions to consider once a case has been remanded. Brandon Cox and Charissa Walker of Tucker Ellis LLP offer tips on how to navigate the remand process.
As litigation funding becomes more widespread, greater complexity and variability in funding deals are to be expected. All claimants should consider certain key questions on the economics of single-case funding when considering or comparing funding terms, says Julia Gewolb of Bentham IMF.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently announced the creation of a new Conscience and Religious Freedom Division, as well as a proposed regulation to help achieve enhanced protections for health care employees. The move may empower more health care workers to express objections to performing or being involved with certain procedures or services, says Steven Collis of Holland & Hart LLP.