AT&T has asked a Texas federal judge to toss a suit brought by a group of landowners over contamination risk from decades-old abandoned telephone cables, saying there is no evidence the cables have damaged any of the properties in question.
An e-cigarette company's vaping liquid was packing more than nicotine with the addition of the active ingredients in erectile dysfunction drugs, a first according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
The owner of an amphibious “duck boat” has filed an action in Missouri federal court seeking to limit its liability over the deadly July sinking that claimed the lives of 17 tourists by citing a federal maritime law enacted in the 19th century.
A look at the careers of attorneys who have dominated oral advocacy at the U.S. Supreme Court over the last decade shows a similar path for men and women, with a few key differences. Here’s how the top 10 male and female advocates stack up. (This article is part of a series examining the gender gap among high court advocates.)
German authorities on Tuesday hit Volkswagen’s luxury division, Audi AG, with a $925 million fine for selling cars rigged to pass emissions tests despite their emissions being higher than allowable standards.
The Florida Supreme Court ruled Monday that a 2013 law that mandated use of the Daubert standard for screening expert witness testimony infringed on the court's rulemaking authority, and reinstated an $8 million verdict for a mesothelioma patient based on its continued support for the current Frye standard.
Two Illinois nonprofits that provide municipalities with workers’ compensation and employee health insurance on Monday hit opioid makers and distributors with a suit they called the first of its kind in the state over the costs of the opioid epidemic.
For the women at elite law firms, an enduring gender gap among advocates can create a high hurdle for their high court ambitions. Here, Law360 looks at the law firms where women score Supreme Court arguments, and where they don’t. (This article is part of a series examining the gender gap among high court advocates.)
Opioid makers and pharmacies on Monday backed a special master's ruling that requires local governments suing drugmakers in multidistrict litigation over the opioid epidemic to identify hundreds of prescriptions, saying that so far they've borne the brunt of coughing up discovery information.
A Boston jury has awarded $43.1 million in damages after finding that the blame for a man’s fatal lung cancer lay with R.J. Reynolds but not with rival tobacco company Philip Morris or an auto parts firm accused of selling asbestos-laden brakes.
Attorneys for six former New England Compounding Center employees accused of misleading regulators about the workings of the facility whose tainted drugs caused a deadly meningitis outbreak placed the blame on the workers' boss in statements to a Boston federal jury Monday.
A Colorado federal judge should follow the lead of federal judges in California and New York and keep a suit lodged by two Colorado counties and a city seeking climate change-related infrastructure damages in federal court, ExxonMobil and Canada's Suncor Energy Inc. said Friday.
A consumer has launched a putative class action against energy drink maker Vital Pharmaceuticals Inc. in Illinois federal court, alleging the company’s Bang energy drinks contain none or only small amounts of the nutritional supplement ingredients claimed on the label.
A Chicago suburb told an Illinois federal court that enough evidence had accumulated to force Northern Illinois Gas Co. and Commonwealth Edison Co. to fund a study into the dangers allegedly posed by their abandoned pipelines leaking hazardous waste into the environment.
A group of drivers seeking economic damages against four car companies over the use of defective Takata Corp. air bags urged a Florida federal court on Friday not to dismiss their claims, saying they overpaid for cars they were told were safe but which in reality had a dangerous defect.
Virginia consumers have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate their claims that Hyundai Motor America Inc. misrepresented the fuel economy of its Elantra cars, saying the Fourth Circuit overstepped in tossing them, since they were already preserved in broader multidistrict litigation in California being reviewed by the Ninth Circuit.
An Oregon federal judge on Monday refused the federal government's bid to end a lawsuit accusing it of failing to protect future generations from the effects of climate change, saying the 21 children who lodged the suit have made a strong enough case to have their claims contested at trial later this month.
A California appeals court issued a last-minute stay of Monday's scheduled trial to determine what penalties Starbucks Corp. and other coffee roasters owe for violating cancer-warning statute Proposition 65, after the roasters asked to wait until the state agency enacting the propositon finalizes a proposed rule saying coffee needs no cancer warnings.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied appeals by Sherwin-Williams, ConAgra and NL Industries seeking to overturn public nuisance judgments that held the companies liable for millions in remediation stemming from lead paint usage from decades before.
While women have made significant inroads into the elite world of U.S. Supreme Court advocacy, last term the number of women arguing at the court hit a decade low. Was it an off year? Or a sign of progress stalled? (This article is the first in a series examining the gender gap among high court advocates.)
After agreeing to review the Third Circuit's 2016 ruling in the Fosamax product liability litigation during the current term, the U.S. Supreme Court invited the federal government to file an amicus brief. A review of the compelling arguments laid out in the brief strongly suggests that this problematic decision will be reversed by the high court, says Stephen McConnell of Reed Smith LLP.
As technology evolves, law firms are increasingly looking for ways to improve communication, transparency and service for their clients. Firms should put knowledge management at the core of their value proposition to create a competitive advantage, says Rob MacAdam at HighQ.
A newly enacted Missouri law makes it a misdemeanor to use the word “meat” on labels of food products that do not come from an animal. Businesses selling meat substitute products in the state that do not meet the new labeling requirements could face liability under another consumer protection statute as well, says Martha Charepoo of Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC.
Last month, California passed the first-ever state legislation aimed at regulating "internet of things" devices. The new law restricts liability to manufacturers of physical hardware — drawing a narrower line than the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's previous guidance, say Michael Buchanan and Michelle Bufano of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP.
Amendments to California's Proposition 65 which came into effect in August change the law's safe harbor warning requirements and create tailored warnings for specific chemical exposures and products. Businesses must keep in mind that even an exposure below legally defined threshold levels can open them to liability, say Lotus Fung and Manuel Fishman of Buchalter PC.
As we watch what passes for political discourse in our nation’s capital, it’s understandable that universities are launching programs on how to cope with ideological disputes. But our country needs fewer people who profess to be open-minded and more people who engage in and honor the conclusions of reasoned debates, says Alex Dimitrief of General Electric Co.
The United Kingdom is positioning itself as the go-to location to develop, test and drive automated vehicles, and has already enacted legislation to provide an insurance model for AVs. But it is not yet clear whether existing U.K. product liability law will be able to accommodate the challenges posed by this new technology, say attorneys with Jones Day.
Dark web monitoring allows law firms to see what sensitive information may have made its way onto the thriving global underground marketplace where cybercriminals buy and sell exposed data. It can also help lawyers advise clients on a wide range of legal and business matters, say Anju Chopra and Brian Lapidus of Kroll.
Interpretations of Rule 45 protections vary but what's clear is that "undue burden" does not mean no burden at all. To avoid the costs of compliance with a subpoena, a nonparty should be ready to demonstrate its disinterest in the litigation and the anticipated cost and burden of compliance, say attorneys at Pepper Hamilton LLP.
Last month, the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a plaintiff's case against Johnson & Johnson over talcum powder. The plaintiff used the product with no ill effect, and alleged no defect, injury or disease. The Third Circuit was correct in finding that she simply lacked any standing to sue, says Steven Boranian of Reed Smith LLP.