Case Activity (670247)

1. Motion | Filed: January 14, 2026 | Entered: January 14, 2026 Wang et al v. Kaiser et al

   Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee | Hawaii

   Pro Hac Vice

   MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Sandy K. Hom Filing fee $ 300, receipt number AHIDC-3254273.Carmen Theresa DiAmore-Siah appearing for Petitioners Baifeng Wang, Bailin Wang, Baishen Wang, Jianqiang Wang, Meikun Zheng (DiAmore-Siah, Carmen)

2. Minutes | Filed: January 14, 2026 | Entered: January 14, 2026 Barclay v. The Gordian Group, Inc., et al.

   Civil Rights: Jobs | Hawaii

   Link

   On September 12, 2025, Plaintiff David Barclay filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit, State of Hawaii against Defendant The Gordian Group, Inc. and Defendant Fortive Corporation. (ECF No. 1-2). The Complaint was subject to the "notice pleading" standard at the time it was filed in Hawaii State Court. See Schnute v. PNC Bank, N.A., 2019 WL 3208645, *4 (D. Haw. July 16, 2019) (explaining that "a more related 'notice' pleading standard applies in [Hawaii] state courts" and that the Hawaii Supreme Court has expressly rejected the federal plausibility pleading, citing Bank of Am., N.A. v. Reyes-Toledo, 428 P.3d 761, 764 (Haw. 2018)).

   On October 16, 2025, Defendant The Gordian Group, Inc. removed the Complaint to the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. (ECF No. 1). The Complaint is now subject to the federal pleading standard which requires a plaintiff to state sufficient facts to plausibly state a claim pursuant to Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) and Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556 (2007). See Moises v. Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., 2022 WL 263576, *2-*3 (D. Haw. Jan. 28, 2022).

   On January 13, 2026, Defendant Fortive Corporation filed:

   DEFENDANT FORTIVE CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (ECF No. 11).

   The Motion to Dismiss relies on the federal plausibility pleading standard set forth in Iqbal and Twombly.

   The Parties are ORDERED to meet and confer as to whether:

   (1)Plaintiff wishes to file an Opposition to Defendant Fortive Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Complaint,

   or in the alternative,

   (2)Plaintiff instead elects to file a First Amended Complaint which would render moot Defendant Fortive Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Complaint.

   The Parties shall file a Notice as to their positions following their meet and confer on or before Wednesday, February 18, 2026.

   (SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR)(tl)

3. 670245 additional result(s)