By Aaron Fahrenkrog, Christine Yun Sauer and Danielle Rosenthal (February 14, 2018, 3:40 PM EST) -- For the last 10 years, the Federal Circuit has issued a series of damages opinions specific to the facts of each case, such as Lucent, LaserDynamics and VirnetX.[1] In several of these opinions, it has generalized prior fact-specific holdings into patent law "rules" and attempted to fit each rule to the next unique fact pattern. By converting fact-specific holdings into patent-specific "rules" without acknowledging fundamental legal principles, the Federal Circuit has created a substantial risk of uncertainty in the trial courts and in the patent system as a whole. The patent community would benefit from the law of patent damages going back to fundamental tort and evidentiary principles....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
