The Maryland surgery center facing the last standing case in the multidistrict litigation over a deadly 2012 meningitis outbreak told a Massachusetts federal judge on Thursday that the suit, set for trial in April, should be sent back to Maryland state court.
Bank of America NA closed out its defense Friday in a California federal trial over a former client manager's blacklisting and defamation claims, calling on a certified public accountant to testify that the plaintiff was “grossly” overstating the value of her blacklisting claim.
Counsel for a group of residential mortgage-backed securities trusts faced skepticism from the bench Friday while delivering closing arguments in a bid to augment the trusts’ allowed Chapter 11 claim against Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. for selling them misrepresented loans, saying their $11.4 billion damage calculations have been substantially supported.
A California federal jury on Thursday found a homeowners association liable for $2 million to its former golf director, who said his supervisor spread distressing lies about him, including that he kept child pornography on his work computer.
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP announced Thursday that it’s snagged the head of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP’s trade secrets practice group to join the firm’s Palo Alto, California, office.
A New Mexico appellate court has upheld a record $165 million jury award to the family of a mother and her four-year-old daughter who were killed when a FedEx tractor trailer collided with a small pickup truck, rejecting FedEx’s argument that the size of the award was sufficient evidence that it was unreasonable.
Todd Howe, the lobbyist-turned-cooperator who is testifying at the bribery trial of a former top aide to New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and three businessmen, was arrested on Thursday night for violating his bail, after a defense lawyer accused him in front of the jury of breaching his plea deal.
After six years in a nursing home, three trials and two hung juries, persistence paid off for Lisa-Maria Carter and her lawyers as they secured a potentially record-setting $109 million decision last month in Florida state court over a botched surgery that led to the loss of her hands and feet and half of her abdomen.
A Virginia federal judge Friday shot down an Oregon-based door skins supplier’s bid to escape antitrust claims, saying there are factual disputes as to whether a 2012 merger enabled the company to engage in anti-competitive behavior to the detriment of a Texas doormaker.
The Second Circuit on Friday overturned a $100 million jury verdict against Arab Bank PLC, finding jury instructions in the case alleging that it provided material support to Hamas and other militant groups were prejudicial against the bank, in a case the bank already settled.
Waymo and Uber have reached a settlement of their self-driving car trade secret row a third of the way through trial, with Uber agreeing to give Waymo a slice of the ride-hailing company's $72 billion equity worth approximately $245 million.
Johnson & Johnson and its top executives were hit with a putative class action in New Jersey federal court on Thursday alleging the company harmed its stockholders by purportedly concealing the truth underlying lawsuits and articles that contend J&J’s talcum powder products contain asbestos.
Waymo’s attorneys questioned a small army of computer experts in a California federal court Thursday in a bid to show that 14,000 files a former employee downloaded from Waymo’s server evidenced corporate espionage meant to speed up Uber’s race toward self-driving cars, while Uber’s attorneys countered the downloads were automatic and meaningless.
A hedge fund owner accused of defrauding two investors out of about $4 million told a New Jersey federal jury Thursday that he spent a portion of the funds in anticipation of earning fees and that he was allowed to put some of the money toward a mortgage on his home.
In a judgment made public Tuesday, a New York state judge denied a motion by a claims management company indirectly owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. to escape a suit claiming it blocked some of the payout on a $7.2 mesothelioma verdict claim, saying the plaintiff had made a sufficient case to go forward.
Attorneys for Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. held firm in closing arguments Thursday that trustees accusing the defunct investment bank of selling toxic mortgage-backed securities have failed to show damages claims in excess of the $2.4 billion Lehman will accept.
Todd Howe, an ex-lobbyist testifying against a former top aide to New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo and three businessmen accused of bribery, endured a brutal afternoon Thursday as jurors saw so many fresh examples of his misconduct that the pace of trial ground to a near-halt and generated a warning from the judge.
During recent trials, Winston & Strawn LLP squeezed a nine-figure settlement out of the Walt Disney Co. over ABC News' "pink slime" reports, saved a pharmacy service provider from doom in a trade secrets case and allowed generic-drug makers to tap into Allergan's $1.5 billion dry-eye medication market, placing the firm among Law360's Practice Groups of the Year.
Former Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP Chief Financial Officer Joel Sanders got a cold reception from a New York state judge when he argued for his conviction to be nixed on Thursday, with the judge questioning whether a key witness had truly recanted.
A Florida appeals court on Thursday said a lower court was right to toss several dozen Engle progeny suits filed by two law firms on behalf of smokers that “had been dead for many years,” just months after a panel of federal judges fined the same firms $9.1 million for filing nearly identical zombie suits.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's recent loss in CFPB v. CashCall suggests that parties willing to litigate against the agency may achieve success even if they lose on the merits, as courts appear reluctant to award the robust remedies the CFPB typically demands, says Ori Lev of Mayer Brown LLP.
On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced 12 new judicial nominations. We will soon discover whether these candidates learned from the mistakes of the three nominees forced to withdraw in December after bipartisan concerns arose over their qualifications, says Arun Rao, executive VP of Investigative Group International.
New research methods are uncovering fresh data about chemical toxicity at a rapid rate, which may catch manufacturers and consumers off guard. The challenge for attorneys is to understand whether and how the science supports their position, and to make a comprehensible and compelling case to judges and juries, say Giovanni Ciavarra and Crista Trippodi Murphy of Innovative Science Solutions.
While technology is making certain aspects of e-discovery faster and easier, it is also creating new challenges as quickly as we can provide solutions. The good news is that there are concrete steps businesses can take to address those challenges, says Peter Ostrega of Consilio LLC.
With film award season in full swing and the Academy Awards right around the corner, actor and trial lawyer Michael DeBlis discusses how some of the tools and techniques of the stage can be used by lawyers in the courtroom.
A recent Law360 guest article suggested that the Florida Supreme Court’s Aubin v. Union Carbide decision changed products liability law in Florida to the benefit of asbestos plaintiffs. Having litigated thousands of asbestos claims in Florida, we must clarify that Aubin follows the long-standing use of the consumer expectations test in asbestos cases, say attorneys Jonathan Ruckdeschel, Alan Pickert, Anita Pryor and Rebecca Vinocur.
One of 2017's most significant product liability rulings may have been the Seventh Circuit's reversal of a settlement over Subway sandwiches that provided "no meaningful relief" to class members. The decision suggests that defendants will have to do more to settle product claims than simply write a check, says J. Philip Calabrese of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP.
Product liability defendants often seek to remove cases to federal court, because federal jurisdiction means federal pleading standards, robust expert discovery, efficiency through uniform procedural and evidentiary rules and, often, more diverse jury pools. Last year, several cases highlighted the evolving removal landscape and addressed four important questions, say Brett Clements and Amy Rubenstein of Schiff Hardin LLP.
In Roverano v. John Crane Inc., the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently ruled that the state's Fair Share Act, which provides for apportionment of liability among tortfeasors, applies to strictly liable defendants in asbestos actions. The challenge will be in formulating arguments over what share of liability each tortfeasor deserves, says Albert Piccerilli of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP.
A California district court's recent decision in TCL v. Ericsson offers two practical approaches that can be used by implementers and standard-essential patent holders, as well as other courts, to assessing a fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory royalty rate, say Fei Deng and Mario Lopez of Edgeworth Economics LLC.