Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Central Intelligence Agency x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Other | District Of Columbia
.Order ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines
MINUTE ORDER. At the court's July 31, 2026, discovery conference, the parties discussed means of narrowing certain requests for production directed to the Executive Office of the President. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 390 (2004) (encouraging "district courts to explore other avenues, short of forcing the Executive to invoke privilege," such as by "narrow[ing], on [their] own, the scope of the subpoenas to allow the Executive to consider whether to invoke executive privilege with respect to a possibly smaller number of documents following the narrowing of the subpoenas" (cleaned up)). Defendants proposed providing the names of the individuals at issue for Requests 11 and 12 to narrow the requests. See also ECF No. 61-3 at 1 (government counsel proposing that Requests 11 and 12 "be narrowed by posing the request as an interrogatory as opposed to a broader and more burdensome document request"). The parties also indicated that identifying the relevant custodians would be a means of narrowing other requests, including Requests 13, 15, and 16. By August 10, 2026, Defendants shall file a notice with the court identifying the names of the individuals at issue for Requests 11 and 12 and the custodians for Requests 13, 15, and 16. To the extent Defendants believe any individual's or custodian's name is properly withheld pursuant to privilege, they shall explain the basis for the privilege, including the relevant legal authorities and required evidentiary basis to support the privilege. Signed by Judge Amir H. Ali on 08/03/2026. (lcaha3)
Order on Motion for Protective Order
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. See document for details. Notwithstanding any language in the attached document, the parties are reminded that Local Civil Rule 5.1(h)(1) requires any party that wishes to file a document under seal to file an accompanying motion to seal. Signed by Judge Amir H. Ali on 08/03/2026. (lcaha3)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.