Response | Filed: August 21, 2026
| Entered: August 21, 2026
State of Maryland et al v. Hegseth et al
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision | Maryland
Response to Motion
RESPONSE to Motion re 95 MOTION to Amend/Correct 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Plaintiff States' Motion for Summary Judgment) (Plaintiff States' Motion for Leave to Supplement Plaintiff States' Motion for Summary Judgment with Additional Decl filed by Frank J. Bisignano, Todd Blanche, Doug Burgum, Douglas A. Collins, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Sean Duffy, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, Peter A. Feldman, Edward C. Forst, Tulsi Gabbard, General Services Administration, Pete Hegseth, Marvin L. Horne, Institute of Museum and Library Services, Jared Isaacman, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Jeffrey A. Koses, Christopher Landau, Howard Lutnick, Linda E. McMahon, Markwayne Mullin, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Ho K. Nieh, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Peace Corps, Kevin R. Rhodes, Brooke L. Rollins, Marco Rubio, Social Security Administration, Keith E. Sonderling(Acting Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor), Keith E. Sonderling(Acting Director, Institute of Museum and Library Services), Brian Stone, John M. Tenaglia, Scott Turner, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, United States, Chris Wright, Lee Zeldin.(Kies, Marianne)