Assessing Atomic Energy Act's Reach At High Court

By Michael Murphy (November 14, 2018, 3:05 PM EST) -- On Nov. 5, the U.S. Supreme Court held oral arguments in Virginia Uranium Inc. v. Warren,[1] which will further define the reach of the Atomic Energy Act, or AEA, to preempt state legislation encroaching on radiological safety. In this case, Virginia passed a moratorium on conventional uranium mining, which is not covered by the AEA. Virginia Uranium challenged this law as preempted, alleging that the purpose behind the statute was to regulate downstream milling and uranium tailings, activities that are regulated by the AEA. The Fourth Circuit upheld the district court's dismissal of Virginia Uranium's complaint because it found the intent of the state irrelevant — the fact that the AEA did not regulate mining was determinative. Based on the court's argument, however, it looks as if the court may overturn the court of appeals decision and require Virginia to provide some plausible nonradiological safety rationale for the legislation that does not intrude on the AEA....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!