Pa. Justices Deny Conflict In Loosening Med Mal Venue Rules

Law360 (February 26, 2019, 9:07 PM EST) -- A Harrisburg budget hearing on Tuesday turned into a forum over a hotly contested proposal to loosen venue rules for medical malpractice cases, with two Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices denying that input from plaintiffs attorneys posed a conflict of interest.

The hearing was ostensibly to discuss the judiciary's budget for the coming fiscal year, but attention quickly turned to the proposal from the court's Civil Procedural Rules Committee. The new rule would roll back a 16-year-old requirement that medical malpractice cases be brought in the county where the alleged injury took place.

Two justices who attended the hearing defended the rulemaking...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!