Indefiniteness Is Evolving In Post-Grant Proceedings

By Deborah Sterling and Yunjun Guo (February 20, 2018, 1:04 PM EST) -- One of the most significant changes made by the America Invents Act is the establishment of three post-grant proceedings: inter partes review, covered business method review and post-grant review. Unlike IPR, in which a patent may be challenged only on the basis of patents and printed publications,[1], patents subject to a CBM or PGR may be challenged on any statutory basis of invalidity.[2] Among the over 600 CBM and PGR challenges brought to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to date, indefiniteness is perhaps the weapon that petitioners wield least....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!