Inside The High Court's Take On Interpreting CBAs

Law360 (March 8, 2018, 2:23 PM EST) -- Resolving a split in the circuits, the U.S. Supreme Court recently decided the case of CNH Industrial v. Reese definitively rejecting what had come to be known as the Yard-Man standard, and reaffirming that collective bargaining agreements must be interpreted according to ordinary contract principles. Although the Supreme Court has long held that ordinary cannons of contract construction apply to collective bargaining agreements, some federal courts developed a specialized set of assumptions, which came to be referred to as the Yard-Man inferences, which allowed them to read beyond the actual contract terms, to reach what in some cases have been more...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!