Illinois Supreme Court Should Clarify Insurance Law: Part 2

Law360 (March 14, 2018, 11:41 AM EDT) -- This is the second part of this article. Read the first part, introducing the contradiction between two recent Illinois appellate decisions, RVP LLC v. Advantage Insurance Services and American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Krop, here. The Illinois Supreme Court now has a chance to resolve the contradiction.

Hoover

Krop fumbled Hoover v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.,[1] which affirmed the dismissal of an untimely negligent-procurement lawsuit against an insurance agent who allegedly did not provide the coverage that the insureds had instructed him to obtain. The appellate court found that the limitations period began to run when the policyholders received their homeowners insurance...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS