The 'No Reasonable Juror' Rule And Antitrust Class Actions

Law360 (November 29, 2018, 2:14 PM EST) -- In Tyson Foods Inc. v. Bouaphakeo,[1] the U.S. Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs had met their burden of showing predominance in a class and Fair Labor Standards Act collective action by relying on their expert's calculation of an average time spent donning and doffing protective gear to be applied to members of the class. Tyson noted that the defendant "did not raise a challenge to respondents' experts' methodology under Daubert," and then invoked the summary judgment standard to review the expert's opinion, stating that "[t]he District Court could have denied class certification on this ground only if it concluded that...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!