Law360 (February 26, 2019, 4:16 PM EST) -- The Federal Circuit on Monday threw out part of a lower court’s decision that trucking products maker Fleet Engineers Inc. did not infringe an inventor’s mud flap patent, saying a Michigan federal judge erred in comparing Fleet’s products to the inventor’s products instead of the patented claims.
In determining that Fleet’s AeroFlap products did not have vanes that infringed inventor Tarun Surti’s patent for mud flaps that prevent spray from impairing drivers’ vision, the district court’s June 2017 decision wrongly compared them to the flaps sold by Surti’s company, Mudguard Technologies, rather than the claim limitations of the patent itself, the...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!