Contamination Doesn't Always Justify An Injunction

Law360 (April 11, 2019, 3:20 PM EDT) -- A few recent decisions by Illinois-based courts show that proving a defendant is liable for environmental contamination does not automatically entitle a plaintiff to a mandatory injunction requiring investigation or remediation. Plaintiffs must still prove what is necessary to be done, and defendants can defeat the injunction request by proving the contamination has already been addressed and no further action is needed.

Two of the recent decisions arose in citizen suits under the Resource Conservation Recovery Act, or RCRA. Other cases resulted from government prosecutions of violations of state statutes.

In LAJIM LLC v. General Electric Co.[1], the plaintiffs owned properties...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!