Law360, Washington (April 22, 2019, 4:27 PM EDT) -- Justice Elena Kagan showed just how mainstream it has become to interpret statutes based solely on their text when she pressed a newspaper's attorney Monday to explain why the Freedom of Information Act doesn't exempt all confidential business information from public disclosure.
In a line of questioning reminiscent of her self-described "textualist" colleague Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Kagan appeared skeptical of adopting an interpretation of FOIA's Exemption Four, covering confidential business information, that she suggested is not based on the words of the statute.
That supposedly "atextual" interpretation says that Exemption Four protects only confidential business information that would likely cause...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has redefined what it means to be the biggest of BigLaw — weighing in at 2,116 attorneys by year end 2018 and becoming the first firm since Law360 began tracking law firm head counts to top 2,000 U.S.-based attorneys.