BIA Divided Over Justices' Immigration Court Notices Ruling

By Nicole Narea (May 1, 2019, 9:04 PM EDT) -- The Board of Immigration Appeals was split Wednesday over how to implement the U.S. Supreme Court's contentious 2018 decision in Pereira v. Sessions with regard to two migrants petitioning for cancellation of removal under the so-called stop-time rule.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act's stop-time rule, noncitizens can petition for cancellation of removal only if they have lived in the U.S. for at least 10 years before receiving a notice to appear. The Supreme Court's decision in Pereira v. Sessions had clarified that, in order to stop the clock, a valid notice to appear must include the time and date of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!