Law360 (May 17, 2019, 8:02 PM EDT) -- A Connecticut state judge addressed one of the biggest questions created by last year's controversial Cyan ruling when he granted a bid to halt discovery pending a decision about whether to dismiss a case over allegedly misleading public offering documents.
The U.S. Supreme Court decided last year that state courts can continue to hear certain securities class actions brought under federal law, causing concern among defense attorneys that they wouldn't have access in state court to protections that are guaranteed in federal court under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
In a question of first impression in Connecticut, Superior Court Judge Charles...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!