Proving Printed Publication As Prior Art In IPR Proceedings

Law360 (January 15, 2020, 4:17 PM EST) -- Over the past seven years, inter partes review proceedings have become an increasingly popular tool with which to challenge the patentability of one or more claims of a patent.[1] IPR proceedings are limited to patentability challenges based solely on novelty or obviousness grounds “only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications.”[2]

In turn, the term “printed publications” encompass a wide gamut of potential prior art, ranging from presentations[3] and preparatory[4] documents to academic theses,[5] textbooks [6] and journal articles.[7]

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS