2nd Circ. Pours Snapple Antitrust Cases Down Drain

Law360, New York (September 24, 2009, 1:55 PM EDT) -- Local drivers who distribute Snapple Beverage Corp. drinks failed to establish injury in price discrimination suits accusing the Rye Brook, N.Y.-based beverage purveyor of letting other distributors horn in on their territory and undersell them, a federal appeals court has ruled.

Having thrown out the plaintiffs' Robinson-Patman Act claims, a federal court did not abuse its discretion in declining supplemental jurisdiction over their state law breach of contract claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said Sept. 22.

According to plaintiff Mitchell Camarda's...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.