Property Co. Can't Force Lloyd's Insurers To Cover Theft

By Jeff Sistrunk (April 13, 2020, 4:27 PM EDT) -- A North Dakota federal judge ruled Friday that underwriters at Lloyd's of London are not obligated to cover a property management company's loss of about $270,000 of client funds to an ex-employee's embezzlement, finding the worker's transmission of the funds to her own account triggered a policy exclusion.

U.S. District Judge Peter D. Welte granted the Lloyd's underwriters' motion to dismiss the breach of contract suit brought by Fargo-based Campbell Property Management LLC, which claimed the underwriters wrongfully denied coverage for a portion of the funds its clients lost to a years-long scheme perpetrated by former CPM financial controller Mickey Haarstad....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!