5 Tips For Tailoring Dress Codes To A Post-Bostock World

By Braden Campbell (August 7, 2020, 6:17 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court's blockbuster Bostock decision has made clear that outdated views on gender norms can get employers in legal trouble. 

Even before the 6-3 ruling on June 15 made clear that Title VII's ban on job discrimination "based on … sex" covers sexual orientation and gender identity, attorneys had cautioned clients against targeting LGBTQ workers for violating gendered appearance policies — or even imposing sex-based standards at all.

Not only do employers risk frustrating workers with policies that turn on increasingly outmoded notions of a gender binary, such policies rarely make business sense, experts say.

"It's really not even necessary; [employers]...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!