Law360 (September 11, 2020, 9:30 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge has tossed the bulk of a former Juul Labs Inc. manager's case claiming the e-cigarette giant uses nondisclosure agreements to stifle whistleblowing, though he will allow the plaintiff to take another stab with documents she says prove her claims.
U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen found the confidentiality provisions of Juul's NDA do not on their face bar whistleblowing or other protected disclosures, saying Marcie Hamilton's four labor code violation claims failed to show the agreement is an illegal "gag order."
"While the NDA contains a confidentiality provision, it is — for the most part — directed...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!