Law360 (November 17, 2009, 1:03 PM EST) -- On Oct. 23, 2009, the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court rejected an abuse-of-dominance case filed by Sursen Electronic Technology Co. Ltd., the operator of a Web site offering digital books, against Shanda Interactive Entertainment Ltd. and Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Co. Ltd.
This decision appears to be the first applying Article 17(4) of the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law (the "AML"), which prohibits an undertaking with a dominant market position from "limiting a counterparty to trading only with it or with an undertaking designated by it without any justification."
The case involved a book Sursen published online in 2008. Shanda had previously hired...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!