Justices Grill Both Sides In Class Arbitration Case

Law360 (December 9, 2009, 6:00 PM EST) -- Both sides were peppered with difficult questions at Wednesday's oral arguments in Stolt-Nielsen SA v. Animalfeeds International Corp., an antitrust case closely watched by employment lawyers that raises the question of whether class arbitration can be imposed on parties whose agreement doesn't specify whether class arbitration is allowed.

The questioning didn't shed any light on how the nation's highest court might rule in the case, said Mayer Brown LLP partner Archis Parasharami, who attended the oral arguments.

"Both sides got very lively and tough questions," Parasharami said.

The Stolt-Nielsen case comes out of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!