NJ Justices Show How To Treat Lack Of Evidence In Voir Dire

Law360 (May 28, 2021, 2:54 PM EDT) -- The New Jersey Supreme Court on Thursday said prosecutors went too far with their voir dire questioning and jeopardized the fairness of a trial in an assault case when they asked jurors if a lack of evidence would affect their ability to serve on the jury.

The state's high court unanimously gave Leo T. Little Jr. a new trial after Little had challenged his conviction on aggravated assault and weapons offenses by arguing that the questioning crafted by prosecutors and asked by the trial court during jury selection deprived him of a fair trial.

Little was accused of pulling a gun...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!