Heed These Rules, Or Risk Your Argument On Appeal

By Michael Soyfer (November 17, 2021, 5:33 PM EST) -- Courts of appeals in recent cases have emphasized — or, more accurately, reemphasized — the importance of preserving arguments for appeal by complying with the briefing standards of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

For instance, on Oct. 15, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Swomley v. Schroyer deemed abandoned conclusory arguments "divorced from legal or factual predicates," in violation of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28's briefing requirements.[1]

Even worse, on Sept. 21 in Banister v. U.S. Bank National Association, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit explained that it "could dismiss [an] appeal on...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!