'DNA: Not Patentable Subject Matter' — Counterpoint

Law360, New York (May 7, 2010, 1:19 PM EDT) -- A guest article appearing in Law360, March 31, 2010, by William L. Warren and Dr. Lei Fang of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP discussed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in AMP v. USPTO (09 Civ. 4515 (RWS), March 29, 2010), which ruled that claims to isolated DNA and methods of use for diagnosis do not qualify as patentable subject matter. The authors also correctly noted that the court avoided a further ruling on whether the U.S. Patent...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.