Law360 (September 3, 2010, 4:52 PM EDT) -- Patent infringement complaints made using Form 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are sufficient to state a cause of action, even when the allegations are insufficiently pled under the U.S. Supreme Court's Twombly and Iqbal standards, a federal magistrate judge has held in recommending the rejection of First Niagara Financial Group Inc.'s bid to toss Automated Transactions LLC's suit over ATM patents.
While Form 18 cannot be reconciled with the heightened pleading standards articulated by the two high court decisions, the sufficiency of Automated Transactions' direct infringement claims are nevertheless governed by Form 18, according to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!