Wal-Mart Falsely Points To Circuit Split, Class Atty Says

Law360, New York (October 21, 2010, 6:50 PM EDT) -- In its petition to the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the certification of a class of 1 million female employees, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. wrongly suggests a split between appellate courts and seeks to second-guess case-specific findings that do not come close to meeting the requirements for certiorari, say plaintiffs in the sex discrimination case.

This is the wrong case to make academic and political arguments about the tension between the class action practice and the American business community, said Joseph Sellers of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Dukes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.


Case Number

3:01-cv-02252

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Jobs

Judge

Charles R. Breyer

Date Filed

June 8, 2001

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.