In Calif., Clarifying The Sophisticated User Defense
December 16, 2010, 3:11 PM EST
Law360, New York (December 16, 2010, 3:11 PM EST) -- The California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. [2010 DJAR 17352] on Nov. 16, 2010, clarifies the scope and application of three distinct but closely related product liability defenses: the “sophisticated user,” the “sophisticated intermediary” and the “bulk supplier” defenses. When properly applied, each can provide a complete defense to design defect “failure to warn” claims under California’s strict product liability law.
In Stewart v. Union Carbide, the defendant Union Carbide attempted to use a “sophisticated purchaser” defense for the failure to...
Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.