Case Study: Williamson V. Mazda

Law360, New York (March 18, 2011, 12:59 PM EDT) -- On Feb. 23, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America Inc.[1] that a 1989 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 (“FMVSS 208”) that gave automobile manufacturers an option to install a “lap belt” or a “lap-and-shoulder belt” on rear aisle or rear middle seats, does not preempt a state tort claim that alleges all seats should have lap-and-shoulder belts. The court explained that preemption did not apply because this 1989 FMVSS 208 seat belt design choice was not based on...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.