US Argues Investors Can't Sue SEC Over Stanford Fraud

Law360, New York (April 8, 2011, 9:31 PM EDT) -- Prosecutors asked a Texas federal judge Thursday to dismiss investors' allegations that they lost more than $18 million because a conflict of interest within the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission kept it from halting Robert Allen Stanford's Ponzi scheme.

The so-called "discretionary function" exception prevents lawsuits based on federal officials' policy considerations and discretionary choices, according to a motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas by U.S. Department of Justice attorneys.

While the plaintiffs allege that the SEC should have...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Robert Juan Dartez, LLC et al v. The United States of America


Case Number

3:11-cv-00602

Court

Texas Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

David C Godbey

Date Filed

March 24, 2011

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.