DR Horton Bears Fruit

Law360, New York (May 31, 2011, 3:08 PM EDT) -- The Supreme Court of Texas recently issued a per curiam opinion reversing a court of appeals decision because the lower appellate court did not consider evidence extrinsic to the pleadings and insurance policy in determining whether a carrier owned a duty to indemnify. See Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 334 S.W.3d 217 (Tex. 2011) (hereinafter BNSF).

The court’s application of D.R. Horton-Texas. Ltd. v. Markel International Insurance Co., 300 S.W.3d 740 (Tex. 2009), reflects the...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.